2016
DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological quality control of non-sterile compounded medicines prepared in a Portuguese hospital centre

Abstract: ObjectivesThis work aimed to evaluate the quality of non-sterile formulations compounded at Centro Hospitalar Cova da Beira (Covilhã, Portugal) immediately after preparation and up to the defined ‘beyond-use date’.MethodsMicrobiological quality control tests were performed in accordance with monograph 5.1.4 of the European Pharmacopoeia 8.0. Samples of compounded products were collected from January to December 2014 after preparation and were analysed immediately and reanalysed after storage under the establis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High microbial loads have been linked to serious illnesses, especially in immunocompromised people. Moreover, microbial metabolites can alter pH levels and cause drugs to deteriorate, which can make them less potent or even fatal due to the formation of degradation products [15]. As a result, successive editions of the Pharmacopoeia enforce microbial contamination limits in non-sterile preparations to avoid drug-induced infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High microbial loads have been linked to serious illnesses, especially in immunocompromised people. Moreover, microbial metabolites can alter pH levels and cause drugs to deteriorate, which can make them less potent or even fatal due to the formation of degradation products [15]. As a result, successive editions of the Pharmacopoeia enforce microbial contamination limits in non-sterile preparations to avoid drug-induced infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%