2014
DOI: 10.5455/ijmsph.2014.150220143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological analysis of packaged drinking water sold in Chennai

Abstract: Background: Adequate supply of fresh and clean drinking water is a basic need for all human beings. In terms of public and environmental health, it is essential that water sources be free of pathogenic bacteria and safe to drink. Continuous increase in the sale and indiscriminate consumption of packaged drinking water is of public health significance. In order to safeguard public health it is essential that the available packaged water is of the highest quality. Aims & Objective: The current study was designed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
16
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
4
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A lot of concern has been raised about the sustainability of packaged water production and consumption, especially in some developing countries, in view of its inadequate regulation, monitoring, safety rule compliance, as well as its potential environmental and health impact. Packaged water has been linked to possible outbreak of water-borne diseases like cholera, found questionable in microbiological qualities (Fisher et al, 2015;Venkatesan et al, 2014), and has already been established as a major contributor to solid waste pollution in some West African countries including Nigeria (Mojekeh and Eze, 2011). However, the association of drinking packaged water with increased phthalate load as found in our study and also previous researches (Kanchanamayoon et al, 2012;Keresztes et al, 2013;Oghenekohwiroro et al, 2016) present another dimension to the worry about packaged water.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lot of concern has been raised about the sustainability of packaged water production and consumption, especially in some developing countries, in view of its inadequate regulation, monitoring, safety rule compliance, as well as its potential environmental and health impact. Packaged water has been linked to possible outbreak of water-borne diseases like cholera, found questionable in microbiological qualities (Fisher et al, 2015;Venkatesan et al, 2014), and has already been established as a major contributor to solid waste pollution in some West African countries including Nigeria (Mojekeh and Eze, 2011). However, the association of drinking packaged water with increased phthalate load as found in our study and also previous researches (Kanchanamayoon et al, 2012;Keresztes et al, 2013;Oghenekohwiroro et al, 2016) present another dimension to the worry about packaged water.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…However, when these seemingly positive roles are juxtaposed with its adverse health and environmental effects, its sustainability becomes doubtful. Studies have identified sachet water as a potential medium of cholera and other microbial disease (Fisher et al, 2015;Venkatesan et al, 2014). Sachet water has constituted a major environmental menace in many developing West African countries where street roads, gutters, and storm drains get clogged from mainly the plastic sleeves of discarded sachets (Oghenekohwiroro et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Nigeria Industrial Standard (NIS), the microbiological limit for thermo tolerant coliform or E. coli is zero colony forming unit (CFU) in 100 mL of packaged drinking water due to health implications (NIS 2007 ). This was similar to the report of Venkatesan et al ( 2014 ) who investigated microbiological safety and quality of packaged drinking water in India.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Unlike our study, as reported in the previous studies done in Nepal, only 10% to 80% of the bottled water samples were free from microbial (Timilshina, et al, 2012;Rai, et al, 2015;Pant, et al, 2016;Maharjan, et al, 2018). In studies done in India, the acceptability of bottled water samples based on the bacteriological parameter ranged from 55% (Gangil, et al, 2013) , 60% (Jeena, et al, 2006;Jain, et al, 2012), 62.5% (Joseph, et al, 2018), 66.7% (Venkatesan, et al, 2014), 73.33% (Bency, et al, 2010), 83% (Sharma & Kaur, 2015) to even 100% (Singla, et al, 2014). In a study done in Saudi Arabia, no bacteria were detected in 94.64% of the bottled water samples (Mohammad & Sulaiman, 2016) while in a similar study done in Malaysia, only 81.81% of the bottled water samples were found unaffected with microbial (Praveena, et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Hence, the examination of the quality of packaged water is necessary not only during the production stages but also in the postproduction stages as well to ensure the quality of the product (Venkatesan, et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%