2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01079.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial succession in the rhizosphere of live and decomposing barley roots as affected by the antagonistic strain Pseudomonas fluorescens DR54-BN14 or the fungicide imazalil

Abstract: The protocol used in the present study was a long-term mesocosm experiment where the microbial succession around live barley roots and subsequent decomposing roots was assessed after seed coating with either the antagonistic strain Pseudomonas fluorescens DR54-BN14 or the fungicide imazalil. Four diversity measures were used: community level physiological profiles (CLPP), Bacteria-specific polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE), actinomycete-specific PCR-DGGE and phospholi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(76 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented here confirm previous findings showing changes in the rhizosphere microbial community structure exposed to exogenous bacterial inoculants (Kozdrój et al, 2004;Nacamulli et al, 1997;Thirup et al, 2003). Furthermore, this study indicates that even two species of the same genus can differently disturb the indigenous microbial communities of young maize seedlings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The results presented here confirm previous findings showing changes in the rhizosphere microbial community structure exposed to exogenous bacterial inoculants (Kozdrój et al, 2004;Nacamulli et al, 1997;Thirup et al, 2003). Furthermore, this study indicates that even two species of the same genus can differently disturb the indigenous microbial communities of young maize seedlings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Further, rhizosphere microbial communities can initially be dominated by r-strategists, such as Proteobacteria. As plants age, rhizosphere communities can be dominated by K-strategists, such as mutualistic bacteria and fungi, suggesting a succession of the rhizosphere communities [9,10,23,30,33,37,38]. Assessing rhizodeposition patterns and the specific bacterial populations within the rhizosphere were beyond the scope of this study, so it is unknown if Agrostis and Andropogon rhizospheres were responding to plant age-root exudation and/or undergoing succession, but these remain potential explanations for the observed patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The numbers of bands in the litter were in the range found in rhizosphere and bulk soil by Duineveld et al (8) but were lower than the numbers of bands in mineral soils in northern Germany (more than 50 bands [unpublished data]) and in The Netherlands (about 50 bands [4]). Compared to the DGGE patterns for rhizosphere soil, the DGGE patterns for bulk soil are generally complex, with many distinct bands (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%