2011
DOI: 10.1128/aem.05341-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Removal of Atmospheric Carbon Tetrachloride in Bulk Aerobic Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a calculated degradation time of ∼ 2600 yr, hydrolysis does not provide a removal rate that could balance air-sea exchange (e.g., Yvon-Lewis and Jeffers et al, 1994), so that leaves us with invoking biological or other unknown mechanisms removing CCl 4 in well oxygenated surface waters. This is an area that requires further investigation, as there is no direct evidence to date for such pathways in the ocean, although there is evidence for microbial removal of CCl 4 in well oxygenated soils (e.g., Mendoza et al, 2011).…”
Section: Explaining the Observed Undersaturationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a calculated degradation time of ∼ 2600 yr, hydrolysis does not provide a removal rate that could balance air-sea exchange (e.g., Yvon-Lewis and Jeffers et al, 1994), so that leaves us with invoking biological or other unknown mechanisms removing CCl 4 in well oxygenated surface waters. This is an area that requires further investigation, as there is no direct evidence to date for such pathways in the ocean, although there is evidence for microbial removal of CCl 4 in well oxygenated soils (e.g., Mendoza et al, 2011).…”
Section: Explaining the Observed Undersaturationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the difference in uptake rates between different terrestrial biomes may be affected by the varying moisture, temperature, and organic carbon content of the terrestrial soils. It has been shown that the addition of organic carbon compounds (methanol, acetate, and succinate) significantly enhanced removal of CCl 4 in marl soils [Mendoza et al, 2011]. This may help explain why ecosystems with high carbon throughput (such as tropical/subtropical forest soils) have higher uptake rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few reported measurements on the terrestrial uptake of CCl 4 , owing to the difficulty and/or expense of conducting field measurements in representative ecosystems [Happell et al, 2014;Happell and Roche, 2003;Happell and Wallace, 1998;Liu, 2006;Mendoza et al, 2011;Rhew et al, 2008a]. Although the soil sink for CCl 4 appears to be widespread, the magnitude of uptake rates in most biomes is small, with the tropical/subtropical forests and agricultural biomes accounting for half of the global uptake rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations