2016
DOI: 10.1007/8623_2016_205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioaugmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, increases in the hydrocarbon degradation rates have also been reported in other sites over short periods of time using bioaugmentation and biostimulation strategies rather than bioattenuation (Yu et al, 2005; Meyer et al, 2014; Müeller et al, 2017). Differences in the obtained results may be explained by studies describing limitations with respect to the biostimulation and bioaugmentation strategies (Boopathy, 2000; Bouchez et al, 2000; Gough and Nielsen, 2016). Regarding biostimulation, the primary challenges are to identify indigenous microbial communities that are capable of degrading target contaminants and to deliver additives in a manner that allows them to be readily available to microorganisms (Boopathy, 2000; Adams et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, increases in the hydrocarbon degradation rates have also been reported in other sites over short periods of time using bioaugmentation and biostimulation strategies rather than bioattenuation (Yu et al, 2005; Meyer et al, 2014; Müeller et al, 2017). Differences in the obtained results may be explained by studies describing limitations with respect to the biostimulation and bioaugmentation strategies (Boopathy, 2000; Bouchez et al, 2000; Gough and Nielsen, 2016). Regarding biostimulation, the primary challenges are to identify indigenous microbial communities that are capable of degrading target contaminants and to deliver additives in a manner that allows them to be readily available to microorganisms (Boopathy, 2000; Adams et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, at some sites and under some conditions, the addition of nutrients may also promote the growth of microorganisms that can outcompete the native contaminant-degrading organisms (Adams et al, 2015). With respect to the bioaugmentation strategy, the ability of microbes to survive over time depends on multiples variables, such as their attachment to surfaces, substrate availability, predator/prey interactions, competition, and other components that can be associated with the site, environmental conditions and the selected microbial consortia (Bouchez et al, 2000; Gough and Nielsen, 2016). Additionally, it has been suggested that the capacity of soil microbial communities to degrade hydrocarbons depends on their previous exposure to the contaminant (Sánchez et al, 2004; Johnsen and Karlson, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioaugmentation can be delivered via several methods including direct injection of micro-organisms, construction of biogranulation (i.e. microbial aggregation), biocurtains (biobarriers), or gene-mediated methods (Gough and Nielsen 2016 ). By utilizing the natural adaptability and abilities of acidophiles to survive in acidic environments, bioaugmentation can be designed for remediation of acidic mine drainage (Anekwe and Isa 2023 ), removal of metal contaminants from acidic sites (Ayangbenro et al 2018 ), treatment of acidic industrial wastewater (e.g.…”
Section: Harnessing Microbial Activity In Contaminated Acidic Environ...mentioning
confidence: 99%