2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial monitoring by molecular tools of an upflow anaerobic filter treating abattoir wastewaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system recovered and microbial diversity was starting to pick up. The Gannoun and Tow's researches [37,41] also found the same results, i.e., the dynamic changes in community diversity were due to the selective pressures in this environment. These results showed that the digestion performance and stability of the reactor were closely related to microbial diversity.…”
Section: Microbial Diversitysupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system recovered and microbial diversity was starting to pick up. The Gannoun and Tow's researches [37,41] also found the same results, i.e., the dynamic changes in community diversity were due to the selective pressures in this environment. These results showed that the digestion performance and stability of the reactor were closely related to microbial diversity.…”
Section: Microbial Diversitysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Based on the OTU results as described in Section 2.5, the alpha diversity and beta diversity were compared between mesophilic and thermophilic digestion. The Shannon index and principal component analysis (PCA) were the most recognized indicators to evaluate the alpha and beta diversity, respectively [37,38]. Table 3 showed the Shannon variation of M1, M2, T1, T2, T3, R1, R2, T3, T4 and T5 under different operation stages.…”
Section: Microbial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of up-flow anaerobic filters (UAFs) has been examined under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions for SWW treatment (Gannoun et al, 2009(Gannoun et al, , 2013. The results showed that COD removal efficiencies of up to 90% can be achieved for organic loading rates (OLRs) of 9000 mg/L day under mesophilic conditions and 72% under thermophilic conditions.…”
Section: Anaerobic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the effective chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal by these anaerobic biotechnologies, some challenges still exist, such as complex three-phase separator and long solids' retention time of UASB, membrane fouling and high energy costs of AnMBR, and high land footprint of ABR. Compared to these high-rate anaerobic reactors, the anaerobic filters (AFs) have drawn attention because of the following advantages [13][14][15]: (1) simple design configuration with low capital and operating costs, (2) excellent capability of high biomass retention with carriers, (3) stable operation, (4) greater tolerance to hydraulic loading rate and organic loading rate, and (5) low footprint. The potential of using AFs for treating wastewater have been well developed not only for industrial wastewater, but also for domestic wastewater [5,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%