2016
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.12874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Contamination in Peeled Chestnuts and the Efficacy of Postprocessing Treatments for Microbial Spoilage Management

Abstract: High undesirable spoilage of peeled chestnuts after thawing prompted a 2006–2007 survey in which chestnuts were quantitatively examined for microbial contaminants after harvest and peeling. Chestnuts (C. sativa × C. crenata cv. “Colossal”) were collected after harvest from seven Michigan farms, and peeled using a commercial‐brulage‐peeler. Average mesophilic aerobic bacteria (MAB), yeast and molds populations in peeled chestnuts were 2.70, 2.74 and 2.51 after harvest; 3.46, 3.27 and 2.40 during peeling; and 5.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As chestnuts possess a relatively higher moisture content (moisture level ~12%) (Beuchat 1978), there is a greater possibility for survival of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms in peeled chestnuts once contamination occurs. Increased levels of spoilage microorganisms in chestnuts during peeling and post-peeling stages have been reported (Donis-Gonzalez et al 2017). This clearly indicates the crosscontamination during peeling process and further survival of contaminants in peeled chestnuts.…”
Section: Microbial Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As chestnuts possess a relatively higher moisture content (moisture level ~12%) (Beuchat 1978), there is a greater possibility for survival of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms in peeled chestnuts once contamination occurs. Increased levels of spoilage microorganisms in chestnuts during peeling and post-peeling stages have been reported (Donis-Gonzalez et al 2017). This clearly indicates the crosscontamination during peeling process and further survival of contaminants in peeled chestnuts.…”
Section: Microbial Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, the removal of the shell and pellicle (which act as natural physical barrier that protects the kernel) can cause the loss of water and contamination of the kernel with opportunistic microorganisms and pathogens (Cantwell 1995;Mencarelli 2001), which negatively affect final quality and safety (Field et al 2006). In an earlier study, average contamination levels of mesophilic aerobic bacteria (MAB), yeast and molds in freshly harvested and unpeeled chestnuts were shown to be 2.70, 2.74 and 2.51 log CFU/g, respectively (Donis-Gonzalez et al 2017). However, the levels of these contaminants were reported to be significantly altered during peeling (3.46, 3.27 and 2.40 log CFU/g) and post-peeling (5.39, 3.09 and <1.70 log CFU/g), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…-Post-processing treatments applied to inoculated peeled chestnuts 3 : X-ray irradiation (70 kV/57 mA, doses 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 kGy); StorOx (2700 ppm hydrogen dioxide + 200 ppm peracetic acid); Agri-cide (1 ppm); 10 ppm chlorine dioxide solution; 0.70 ppm ozone solution; 80 ppm peracetic acid; 100 ppm chlorine solution; 0.2 M sodium chloride; warm water at 65 • C) [77] -Gaseous ozone [66] -Hot-water treatment + enzymes able to degrade the fungal cell wall [63] Applying good management practices in the orchards is essential for reducing the spread and inoculum density of G. smithogilvyi. Dobry and Campbell [18] suggest removing the litter after harvesting to reduce the inoculum.…”
Section: Stage Methods Referencementioning
confidence: 99%