Core Microbiome 2022
DOI: 10.1002/9781119830795.ch15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Biofilms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 119 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, our results with the LF‐89 type strain indicate that the treatment with an over‐MIC (1 μg/mL) dose of FLO also decreased the bacterial count in both materials used; however, the antibiotic was more effective against the planktonic bacteria generating a higher reduction of live P. salmonis than when the bacteria is part of the biofilm. In addition, several reports indicates that the biofilm‐embedded bacteria are less susceptible to antimicrobials and/or could develop antibiotic resistance in its natural environment, which could be acquired from other microorganisms via transference of genetic material by plasmids and extracellular vesicles, among others (Dincer et al, 2020; Hall & Mah, 2017; Singh & Das, 2022). However, our study evaluated only P. salmonis in an in vitro system, so the decrease in the effect of the FLO on the count of live bacteria seems to be generated by the biofilm matrix (Marshall et al, 2012), which confers a protected environment for the bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, our results with the LF‐89 type strain indicate that the treatment with an over‐MIC (1 μg/mL) dose of FLO also decreased the bacterial count in both materials used; however, the antibiotic was more effective against the planktonic bacteria generating a higher reduction of live P. salmonis than when the bacteria is part of the biofilm. In addition, several reports indicates that the biofilm‐embedded bacteria are less susceptible to antimicrobials and/or could develop antibiotic resistance in its natural environment, which could be acquired from other microorganisms via transference of genetic material by plasmids and extracellular vesicles, among others (Dincer et al, 2020; Hall & Mah, 2017; Singh & Das, 2022). However, our study evaluated only P. salmonis in an in vitro system, so the decrease in the effect of the FLO on the count of live bacteria seems to be generated by the biofilm matrix (Marshall et al, 2012), which confers a protected environment for the bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%