2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-326x(99)00209-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial and Meiofaunal Response to Intensive Mussel-Farm Biodeposition in Coastal Sediments of the Western Mediterranean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
91
2
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
91
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an intensive shellfish farming still can result in the accumulation of a large amount of organic matter on the seabed below the farm (Mirto et al, 2000;Grant et al, 2012) and a decrease of dissolved oxygen in seawaters (Kaiser, 2000). Consequently, some case studies have shown evidence of negative effects on benthic communities via the intense biodeposition of feces and pseudofeces (e.g., Gilbert et al, 1997;Smith & Shackley, 2004;da Costa & Nalesso, 2006;Dubois et al, 2007;Fabi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an intensive shellfish farming still can result in the accumulation of a large amount of organic matter on the seabed below the farm (Mirto et al, 2000;Grant et al, 2012) and a decrease of dissolved oxygen in seawaters (Kaiser, 2000). Consequently, some case studies have shown evidence of negative effects on benthic communities via the intense biodeposition of feces and pseudofeces (e.g., Gilbert et al, 1997;Smith & Shackley, 2004;da Costa & Nalesso, 2006;Dubois et al, 2007;Fabi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their small size, high turnover, and the lack of larval dispersion, meiofauna have attracted increasing interest due to their being a marker of environmental changes (Higgins & Thiel, 1988;Coull & Chandler, 1992), and particularly to their being a useful tool for monitoring the impact of aquaculture activities (Mazzola et al, 2000;Mirto et al, 2000). In the present study, the meiobenthic community was used to examine the ecological impact of hand raking for Manila clams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the effect of mussel culture on nematodes, CASTEL et al (1989), GUELORGET et al (1994) and MAHMOUDI et al (2008) found an increase in densities; MIRTO et al (2000) and NETTO and VALGAS (2007) reported a decrease in abundances and DANOVARO et al (2004) and PINTO et al (2007) found no significant changes. Concerning the effect of shrimp farm impacts, PATRONA et al (2012) found a decrease in meiobenthos abundance and NETTO and MEURER (2007) registered a decrease in nematode abundance but only after the postcultivation period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meiofauna has also been used in studies of environmental impact caused by worldwide farming, such as that of mussel farms (MIRTO et al, 2000;DANOVARO et al, 2004;PINTO et al, 2007;MAHMOUDI et al, 2008;VALGAS, 2010), fish farms (MAZZOLA et al, 1999;LA ROSA et al, 2001;MIRTO et al, 2002;SUTHERLAND et al, 2007;GREGO et al, 2009;RIERA et al, 2011;MIRTO et al, 2012;RIERA et al, 2012) and that of seaweed (ÓLAFSSON et al, 1995). These studies have used the whole meiofauna community, or isolated groups as Nematoda and Copepoda, and as a general rule the faunal responses are rather uniform with an initial enrichment in meiofaunal numbers and a decrease in diversity with an increase in the dominance of a few species (GIERE, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%