2019
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile among Isolates of Clinical Samples of Cancer Patients admitted in the Intensive-care Unit at Regional Tertiary Care Cancer Center: A Retrospective Observational Study

Abstract: Cancer patients in intensive care unit (ICU) are vulnerable for developing multidrug resistant nosocomial infections. The antimicrobial resistance due to inappropriate use of antibiotics results in significant morbidity and mortality in these cancer patients. The present retrospective study was done to describe the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of common organisms in isolates of clinical samples of patients admitted in ICU at our tertiary care cancer center. Materials and methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is slightly higher than the study conducted by Naznzeen et al; where S.aureus was reported at 65.38% among gram-positive isolates. (7) This finding was rather different from the prevalence rate in a study done by Kumar et al [25] In this study, E.coli 34.0% reported the highest growth in the pus sample which is in contrast to many studies where E.coli was reported low 13%, [26] 8.3%, [27] 16.5% [28] and 14.0%. [29] Similarly, in the urine sample, the predominant isolate observed was E.coli 55.8 % in this study which is similar to a study done by Shrestha et al where E.coli was reported at 58.0% in urine samples.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…This finding is slightly higher than the study conducted by Naznzeen et al; where S.aureus was reported at 65.38% among gram-positive isolates. (7) This finding was rather different from the prevalence rate in a study done by Kumar et al [25] In this study, E.coli 34.0% reported the highest growth in the pus sample which is in contrast to many studies where E.coli was reported low 13%, [26] 8.3%, [27] 16.5% [28] and 14.0%. [29] Similarly, in the urine sample, the predominant isolate observed was E.coli 55.8 % in this study which is similar to a study done by Shrestha et al where E.coli was reported at 58.0% in urine samples.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…They noted that 50% of Enterococcus were vancomycin resistant, whereas, in our study, only 8.3% of Enterococcus were vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). This may be attributed to the fact that vancomycin is not used for empirical prophylactic therapy in our hospital settings [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They often undergo invasive procedures such as intra-tracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation, insertion of intravascular and urinary catheters, using monitoring devices as part of a routine or to closely monitor and deliver therapies resulting in Device-associated Hospital-acquired Infections (DA-HAIs) in some of the patients, especially if proper care-bundle is not observed [1,2]. Furthermore, there are usually several other risk factors in these patients making them vulnerable to develop nosocomial infections leading to high morbidity and mortality [3,4]. The rate of occurrence of infection among patients in the ICU is five to sevenfold higher as compared to general inpatient admissions contributing to 20-25% of all nosocomial infections in a hospital [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of infection, the profile of pathogens causing these infections, their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns also vary according to the location. It is, therefore, imperative for the treating clinician to have adequate information of the spectrum of microorganisms and the AMR patterns prevalent in that particular setting for initiating empirical therapy with appropriate antimicrobial agents [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%