2020
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-2020-78
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbarom radiation and propagation model assessment using infrasound recordings: a vespagram-based approach

Abstract: Abstract. This study investigates the use of a vespagram-based approach as a tool for multi-directional comparison between simulated microbarom soundscapes and infrasound data recorded at ground-based array stations. Data recorded at the IS37 station in northern Norway during 2014–2019 have been processed to generate vespagrams (velocity spectral analysis) for five frequency bands between 0.1 and 0.6 Hz. The back-azimuth resolution between vespagrams and a microbarom model is harmonized by smoothing the modell… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Propagating microbaroms are often received at distant infrasound arrays and typically peak around 0.2 Hz (Campus & Christie, 2010). Various studies have focused on comparing microbarom simulations and distant IMS array observations (De Carlo, Hupe, et al, 2020;Landes et al, 2012;Vorobeva et al, 2020). Such studies are hampered by the relatively large distance of the arrays to the microbarom source regions, which is often largely spread out (∼ 2 10,000 km ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propagating microbaroms are often received at distant infrasound arrays and typically peak around 0.2 Hz (Campus & Christie, 2010). Various studies have focused on comparing microbarom simulations and distant IMS array observations (De Carlo, Hupe, et al, 2020;Landes et al, 2012;Vorobeva et al, 2020). Such studies are hampered by the relatively large distance of the arrays to the microbarom source regions, which is often largely spread out (∼ 2 10,000 km ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the detection of multiple signals at different frequencies is possible, there exists the chance that if there are two or more signals in the same frequency band, that the PMCC approach could miss these secondary signals. Further studies could involve a similar analysis using sensors able to separate coherent signals overlapping in the same time-frequency domain such as the CLEAN algorithm (den Ouden et al, 2020) or the vespagram approach (Vorobeva et al, 2021). By performing a similar analysis on these multi-source results, and generating the same types of reference curves, such data analysis approaches would allow building reference curves for these additional infrasound analysis methods.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%