2006
DOI: 10.1038/nrg1749
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus

Abstract: In just a few years, microarrays have gone from obscurity to being almost ubiquitous in biological research. At the same time, the statistical methodology for microarray analysis has progressed from simple visual assessments of results to a weekly deluge of papers that describe purportedly novel algorithms for analysing changes in gene expression. Although the many procedures that are available might be bewildering to biologists who wish to apply them, statistical geneticists are recognizing commonalities amon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
966
0
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,155 publications
(987 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
8
966
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical next step involves statistical comparisons across groups of interest using either parametric or non-parametric analysis of variance. Unfortunately, there is no clear consensus as to which statistical test is most appropriate for a given data set, and it is particularly troubling that lists of 'differentially regulated genes', from the same data set, can substantially vary based on the statistical test [8,9]. Regardless of what statistical test one uses, it is imperative that the statistical test incorporates corrections for multiple comparisons to account for a substantially high risk of false positives.…”
Section: Technology Approaches and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical next step involves statistical comparisons across groups of interest using either parametric or non-parametric analysis of variance. Unfortunately, there is no clear consensus as to which statistical test is most appropriate for a given data set, and it is particularly troubling that lists of 'differentially regulated genes', from the same data set, can substantially vary based on the statistical test [8,9]. Regardless of what statistical test one uses, it is imperative that the statistical test incorporates corrections for multiple comparisons to account for a substantially high risk of false positives.…”
Section: Technology Approaches and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 False discovery rate q-values were calculated by multiplying the P-values by the number of tests performed and then dividing them by the rank order of each P-value. Rank order 1 was assigned to the smallest P-value.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an integration method, the higher the ratio between intra-EC gene similarities and inter-EC gene similarities, the better the integration method is. Quantitatively, we utilize the logged fold change (LogFC) measure which has been widely used in the gene expression studies [31]. The LogFC score of EC ei is defined in Eq 7:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%