2002
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.31388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microalbuminuria in the US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

38
263
13
14

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
38
263
13
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of microalbuminuria in hypertensive individuals in our study was 9.5%, a value slightly lower than that found by other authors 17 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The prevalence of microalbuminuria in hypertensive individuals in our study was 9.5%, a value slightly lower than that found by other authors 17 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20] The prevalence of MA among the study subjects was lower than that reported for a study of the general population. [5][6][7] This is expected following the selection criteria for the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 An appreciable prevalence of MA (5-9.7%) has been found in those without diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease. [5][6][7] Furthermore, MA has been used to predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality even in apparently healthy people. [5][6][7][8] However, at present it is unclear what underlies the relationship between MA and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] African Americans were reported to have greater rates of proteinuria. 11 It also is known that racial and ethnic minority status in the United States often is associated with low SES, and these factors may impact on clinical outcomes in a wide variety of diseases, including CVD and CKD. [12][13][14] The association between racial and ethnic minority status and low SES may mask important differences in clinical risk profiles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%