2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5126027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro–nanoparticles magnetic trap: Toward high sensitivity and rapid microfluidic continuous flow enzyme immunoassay

Abstract: In this work, we developed a microfluidic system for immunoassays where we combined the use of magnetic nanoparticles as immunosupport, a microfluidic magnetic trap, and a fluorogenic substrate in continuous flow for detection which, together with the optimization of the functionalization of surfaces to minimize nonspecific interactions, resulted in a detection limit in the order of femtomolar and a total assay time of 40 min for antibiotin antibody detection. A magnetic trap made of carbonyl-iron microparticl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetic trapping works similarly to electrical but is implemented instead with a magnetic field. A field gradient is generated by magnets on chip and is then used to hold molecules that are bound to magnetic nanobeads [ 5 ]. Optical trapping can be implemented using on-chip counter propagating dual beam divergence and loss-based traps to hold particles for further manipulation [ 6 , 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic trapping works similarly to electrical but is implemented instead with a magnetic field. A field gradient is generated by magnets on chip and is then used to hold molecules that are bound to magnetic nanobeads [ 5 ]. Optical trapping can be implemented using on-chip counter propagating dual beam divergence and loss-based traps to hold particles for further manipulation [ 6 , 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have used AM methods to generate physiological structures filled with MNP for MPI but have not investigated their suitability for MRI [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. In addition, special consideration should be given to the interaction of phantom materials with the MPI tracer, since nonspecific absorption on the material surface [ 12 , 13 ] may lead to signal alterations of the immobilized tracer [ 14 ]. Furthermore, it is important to ensure that these materials do not produce magnetic signals [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%