2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-milling of areal material measures – influences on the resulting surface topography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An overview on previous studies on the manufacturing of material measures has already been presented by some of the authors [12,22,23]. The methods range from ultraprecision cutting processes, such as micro-milling [24][25][26][27] to classical processes from microtechnology, such as focused ion beam [28] or lithographic methods [29].…”
Section: Results Of Further Comparisons Have Been Publishedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overview on previous studies on the manufacturing of material measures has already been presented by some of the authors [12,22,23]. The methods range from ultraprecision cutting processes, such as micro-milling [24][25][26][27] to classical processes from microtechnology, such as focused ion beam [28] or lithographic methods [29].…”
Section: Results Of Further Comparisons Have Been Publishedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This toolpath was designed based on a point cloud representing the target surface topography. For the control dataset (G-Code) of the examined material measures according to ISO 25178-70 a spacing of 4 μm between two tool paths of the meander was determined to be a suitable value for first tool T1 [38]. However, since the wavelengths of the target geometry of the Sk material measure are smaller than for the material measures according to ISO 25178-70, the distance between two tool paths has been reduced in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the configurations was applied to a measured surface of a cylinder liner. The discretization value also defines the setup of the control dataset for the later performed manufacturing and was chosen based on the results of the preliminary studies [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eifler és mtsai. az Sa és Sq paraméter értékekkel hasonlították össze a 600×600 μm 2 területeken mért eredményeket, ahol F-operátort és Gauss típusú L-szűrőt alkalmaztak a kiértékelések során (Eifler et al, 2018). Magnéziumötvözet nagysebességgel homlokmart felületein elemezte az érdességet Zagórski és Korpysa az Abbott-Firestone görbét és az Sa, St, Sp, Sv, Ssk és Sku mérőszámokat felhasználva (Zagórski et al, 2020).…”
Section: Bevezetésunclassified