2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-017-3120-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-CT and FIB–SEM imaging and pore structure characterization of dolomite rock at multiple scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e FIB-SEM 3D tomography enables the direct observation of the three-dimensional microstructure at nanoscale resolution through the 3D reconstruction of the sequential sets of 2D images. Furthermore, owing to recent advances in imaging and computer technology, numerical simulation based on FIB-SEM 3D tomography technique is one of the most accurate [27,49,50], phase distribution, crystallographic interfaces, and defect arrangements [26]. However, the quantification errors in the microstructural parameters are inevitable because of the limited sample size and resolutions in the FIB-SEM observation, uncertainty in the image processing (e.g., alignment and segmentation), and the accuracy of the quantification method/model itself applied to the image data [51].…”
Section: D Reconstruction Of Fib-sem Sequential Cross-sectionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e FIB-SEM 3D tomography enables the direct observation of the three-dimensional microstructure at nanoscale resolution through the 3D reconstruction of the sequential sets of 2D images. Furthermore, owing to recent advances in imaging and computer technology, numerical simulation based on FIB-SEM 3D tomography technique is one of the most accurate [27,49,50], phase distribution, crystallographic interfaces, and defect arrangements [26]. However, the quantification errors in the microstructural parameters are inevitable because of the limited sample size and resolutions in the FIB-SEM observation, uncertainty in the image processing (e.g., alignment and segmentation), and the accuracy of the quantification method/model itself applied to the image data [51].…”
Section: D Reconstruction Of Fib-sem Sequential Cross-sectionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, currently, the most common and effective curtain-removal solution is adjusting the milling parameters according to the unique properties of each targeted material or polishing it before milling. Filling the internal pores with additional resin can help recognize the pore region [49,50].…”
Section: Potential Applications Of Fib-sem 3d Tomography In Carbon-bamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence of images obtained in successive layers can be assembled into a 3D image, similar to those resulting from X-ray CT tomography, and subsequently segmented ( Salzer et al, 2015 ; Liu et al, 2017 ). In the last few years, this approach has been used extensively to investigate the morphological characteristics of dolomite rocks, shales, and clays using BIB alone ( Houben et al, 2013 ), a combination of BIB- and FIB-SEM ( Hemes et al, 2015 ), or the joint use of micro-CT and FIB-SEM ( Devarapalli et al, 2017 ). In soils, FIB-SEM presents a tremendous potential, but its use appears to have been limited so far to observations of microbially induced calcite precipitation in sandy soils ( Li et al, 2017 ) and to obtain high-resolution images of the colonization of soil–root interfaces ( Vidal et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Progress On the Physical Frontmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most cases, a part of the microscopic pore space could not be captured by NMR or micro-CT. This is where SEM imaging has been used for improving the result and also resolving the issues of the microporous phase in CT images [28][29][30]. Therefore, the existing models are based more on the intragranular pores rather than the precise pore space characteristic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%