2019
DOI: 10.1002/esp.4764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro‐computed tomography imaging and probabilistic modelling of rock fracture by freeze–thaw

Abstract: A major problem in studies of rock fracture by frost is the paucity of direct observations in space and time of the initiation and growth of microcracks and their transition to macrocracks. Such observations are essential to understand the location, timing and controls of rock fracture by freeze–thaw. The aim of the present work is to image and elucidate the early stages of rock fracture by applying imaging and statistical methods to a frost‐weathering experiment using intact specimens of a limestone (chalk) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test the sensitivity of the WH‐Model to hydraulic properties, we increased the applied hydraulic conductivity (5 × 10 −14 m s −1 ) by four orders of magnitude to include a similar variation as in the R‐Model. Crack length varies in rocks (Maji & Murton, 2020) and needs to be assumed, therefore, we conducted tests using a crack length of 0.01 and 0.1 m. Fracture toughness varies between rock types and comprises a wide range within each rock type (Atkinson, 1984). For our model approach, we used a mean value of fracture toughness derived from an estimation based on uniaxial strength measurements (Chang et al., 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the sensitivity of the WH‐Model to hydraulic properties, we increased the applied hydraulic conductivity (5 × 10 −14 m s −1 ) by four orders of magnitude to include a similar variation as in the R‐Model. Crack length varies in rocks (Maji & Murton, 2020) and needs to be assumed, therefore, we conducted tests using a crack length of 0.01 and 0.1 m. Fracture toughness varies between rock types and comprises a wide range within each rock type (Atkinson, 1984). For our model approach, we used a mean value of fracture toughness derived from an estimation based on uniaxial strength measurements (Chang et al., 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maji and Murton (2020b) classified different zones of microcracking based on microcomputed tomography (μ‐CT) analysis of 20 freeze‐thaw cycles of a cylindrical core of the same chalk lithology (30 mm long, 20 mm diameter). However, the mechanisms of crack propagation were not identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the sensitivity of the WH-Model to hydraulic properties, we increased the applied hydraulic conductivity (5 × 10 −14 m s −1 ) by four orders of magnitude to include a similar variation as in the R-Model. Crack length varies in rocks (Maji & Murton, 2020) and needs to be assumed, therefore, we conducted tests using a crack length of 0.01 and 0.1 m. Fracture toughness varies between rock types and comprises a wide range within each rock type (Atkinson, 1984). For our model approach, we used a mean value of fracture toughness derived from an estimation based on uniaxial strength measurements (Chang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Frost Cracking Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%