2018
DOI: 10.1166/jbt.2018.1711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro and Nano Structural Analysis of Dental Ceramic and Luting Resin Interface and the Effect of Water Exposure on Integrity of Cement Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be mainly attributed to the presence of ammonium polyflouride acid in the monobond etch and prime which is a weak acid salt of hydrofluoric acid in contrast to the two step surface treatment protocol which utilizes a stronger 5% hydrofluoric acid as an etchant.It was well documented by earlier studies that the number, width and depth of the microporosities is directly related to the concentration of acid and duration of etching.The use of weaker acid or shorter etching time results in an underetched surface which in turn reduces bond strength (56) . Under etching partially etches the glassy matrix creating shallower porosities which may impede complete penetration of the subsequently applied viscous resinous material (57) Previous studies also demonstrated positive correlation between ceramic surface area, roughness and wettability which are important parameters affecting bond strength with concentration of acid and etching duration (56,58,59) A study conducted by Asiri et al in 2018 (60) showed that ceramic specimens treated with two step protocol had higher roughness values and bond strength than that treated with one step self etching primers. Another study was carried by Sherer et al in 2018 (61) examining lithium disilicate ceramic surfaces treated with one step and two step conditioning methods using scanning electron microscope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be mainly attributed to the presence of ammonium polyflouride acid in the monobond etch and prime which is a weak acid salt of hydrofluoric acid in contrast to the two step surface treatment protocol which utilizes a stronger 5% hydrofluoric acid as an etchant.It was well documented by earlier studies that the number, width and depth of the microporosities is directly related to the concentration of acid and duration of etching.The use of weaker acid or shorter etching time results in an underetched surface which in turn reduces bond strength (56) . Under etching partially etches the glassy matrix creating shallower porosities which may impede complete penetration of the subsequently applied viscous resinous material (57) Previous studies also demonstrated positive correlation between ceramic surface area, roughness and wettability which are important parameters affecting bond strength with concentration of acid and etching duration (56,58,59) A study conducted by Asiri et al in 2018 (60) showed that ceramic specimens treated with two step protocol had higher roughness values and bond strength than that treated with one step self etching primers. Another study was carried by Sherer et al in 2018 (61) examining lithium disilicate ceramic surfaces treated with one step and two step conditioning methods using scanning electron microscope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of dental composites, many studies have confirmed that the compositions of dental composites and the matrix/filler interfacial interaction have a great influence on their service performance . In addition to the well‐studied compositions of the resin matrix and fillers, some previous work also found that the excellent interfacial compatibility and strong interfacial interaction of the organic/inorganic phase are beneficial for the long‐term clinical application of dental composites . The commonly used oxide fillers possess MOH bonds on their surface, resulting in filler agglomerations upon blending with the resin matrix and subsequently decreasing the fracture resistance of dental composites .…”
Section: Modification Technologies To Improve the Matrix/filler Intermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEM images of fracture surface of the resin composites with the filler of a) s‐SiO 2 , b) PGSHW/s‐SiO 2 (2:4), c) PGSHW/s‐SiO 2 (4:2), and d) PGSHW. Reproduced with permission . Copyright 2014, Elsevier Ltd.…”
Section: Modification Technologies To Improve the Matrix/filler Intermentioning
confidence: 99%