2010
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201000344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micellar electrokinetic chromatography: A practical overview of current methodological and instrumental advances

Abstract: This review highlights recent methodological and instrumental advances in MEKC focused on the improvement of this CE technique in routine analyses. As in the previous reviews, the present one deals with the last 2 years' most relevant methodological contributions for improving sensitivity and resolution in MEKC as well as instrumental research related to MS and LIF detection. The most widespread approaches are discussed in detail, including enhancements in sensitivity arising from the use of on-line sample con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
(247 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MEKC grew to a similar extent as regards methodological and instrumental advances in its implementation in routine analysis laboratories over the reviewed period (2010 and 2011) as in previous ones ; however, some emergent topics included in previous reviews have failed to fully meet their initial expectations. Thus, the use of carbon nanostructures and ionic liquids as alternative pseudostationary phases (PSPs) for SDS has not progressed as expected, and no new uses of in‐capillary derivatization have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MEKC grew to a similar extent as regards methodological and instrumental advances in its implementation in routine analysis laboratories over the reviewed period (2010 and 2011) as in previous ones ; however, some emergent topics included in previous reviews have failed to fully meet their initial expectations. Thus, the use of carbon nanostructures and ionic liquids as alternative pseudostationary phases (PSPs) for SDS has not progressed as expected, and no new uses of in‐capillary derivatization have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The key problem in constructing a 2D CE separation system lies in designing a reliable interface to switch the effluents from the first dimension to the second. As in previous reviews , Dovichi's group continues to be the most salient reference in this field; in recent years, however, Zhang and Zhang have introduced a remarkable innovation involving the incorporation of a sample concentration step between the two dimensions to avoid sample zone diffusion at the interface. Thus, the electroaccumulation focusing method was used at the junction between the two capillaries to avoid diffusion of the primarily preconcentrated and separated analyte bands at the interface.…”
Section: Approaches To Improving Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MCE analysis, SDS is the most commonly used PSP because of its high stability, low Krafft point and high solubilizing power. 4 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SDS micelles in MEKC often show insufficient selectivity for highly hydrophobic compounds as all analytes tend to be partitioned into micelles and migrate with the same velocity [1,2]. Many alternative approaches for improving resolution in MEKC have been developed in recent years [3][4][5][6], the most popular and effective being the use of additives. This approach works by altering the apparent distribution constant between micelles and the surrounding medium or the velocity ratio of the two phases [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%