2015
DOI: 10.1021/ac503903j
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophoretic Extraction of Low Molecular Weight Cationic Analytes from Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Containing Sample Matrices for Their Direct Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: While the use of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in separation buffers allows efficient analysis of complex mixtures, its presence in the sample matrix is known to severely interfere with the mass-spectrometric characterization of analyte molecules. In this article, we report a microfluidic device that addresses this analytical challenge by enabling inline electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) of low molecular weight cationic samples prepared in SDS containing matrices. The functionality of this devi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prepare our microchips for an experiment, the entire fluidic network was treated with 1 M NaOH for 1 h followed by sequential rinses with water, methanol, and acetone for 10 min each. The glass surface within the microchannels was then derivatized with a solution of N ‐(2‐triethoxysilylpropyl) formamide for 2 h at room temperature to suppress EOF in the system [33, 41]. This coating material was prepared by mixing stoichiometric amounts of commercially available 3‐aminopropyltriethoxysilane with ethyl formate and reacting the two chemicals under ambient conditions for 48 h [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To prepare our microchips for an experiment, the entire fluidic network was treated with 1 M NaOH for 1 h followed by sequential rinses with water, methanol, and acetone for 10 min each. The glass surface within the microchannels was then derivatized with a solution of N ‐(2‐triethoxysilylpropyl) formamide for 2 h at room temperature to suppress EOF in the system [33, 41]. This coating material was prepared by mixing stoichiometric amounts of commercially available 3‐aminopropyltriethoxysilane with ethyl formate and reacting the two chemicals under ambient conditions for 48 h [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this challenge, our group has reported the use of N ‐(2‐triethoxysilylpropyl) formamide as a coating medium [39, 40] that was shown to diminish EOF in glass microchannels by over five orders of magnitude practically eliminating the unwanted mixing observed in narrow FFZE conduits. These devices were later applied to efficient peptide separations [33] as well as peptide extraction from SDS‐containing sample matrices [41] coupled to analyte quantitation based on the ESI‐MS method. Continuing this effort, the present article describes the application of the noted FFZE device toward reducing matrix effects in the quantitation of low molecular weight species suspended in a complex biofluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, methodologies for in‐line removal of SDS prior to MS analysis are desirable. Recently, some interesting in‐line approaches with microfluidic devices were based on free‐flow zone electrophoresis , on semipermeable membranes in a cross‐flow filtration process , or on membranes to collect CGE resolved peaks . The latter approach made use of additional membrane washing steps for SDS removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, it allowed direct on‐membrane MALDI‐TOF‐MS protein analysis. In the case of MEKC‐MS where SDS is included in the BGE, partial filling strategies or anodically migrating micelles were the most employed strategies to avoid SDS entering the MS source .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDS-removal systems integrated with ESI-MS (integrated SDS removal–ESI-MS) should increase sample throughput and minimize sample loss and thus are desired in proteomic workflows. Despite these advantages, integrated systems for SDS removal are scarce with only one paper reporting on them . Efficient removal of SDS is the basic requirement in integrated SDS removal–ESI-MS, because even small concentrations of SDS (i.e., >0.3 mM) are detrimental to ESI-MS .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%