Proceedings of the Fourth Annual IEEE International Workshop on Workload Characterization. WWC-4 (Cat. No.01EX538)
DOI: 10.1109/wwc.2001.990739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MiBench: A free, commercially representative embedded benchmark suite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1,389
0
16

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,926 publications
(1,406 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1,389
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The telecom and consumer suite of the MiBench benchmark [18] provides representative applications for these devices. They are used to evaluate memory and performance overhead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The telecom and consumer suite of the MiBench benchmark [18] provides representative applications for these devices. They are used to evaluate memory and performance overhead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of the different Multistack implementations, we ran the telecom and consumer suite of the MiBench benchmark [18] on a Sharp PC-z1 running Ubuntu Linux 9.04 (kernel 2.6.28). This netbook is equipped with an ARM Cortex-A8 CPU running at 800 MHz and 512 MiB RAM.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each experiment runs for 2 × 10 7 instructions per core with a different benchmark mix randomly selected from our representative pool of benchmark suites. We used WCET benchmarks from Mälardalen University [7], SPLASH2 [29] from the University of Delaware, and MiBench [8] to cover a broad range of applications, with a mix of integer, floating-point and memory instructions. For each experiment different duty-cycle levels are set for each topological ring in the architecture.…”
Section: A Experimental Setup and Methodology Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows the contention level as well as the dynamic power for router five considering a 16-core 2D-mesh where the NoC runs at 100 MHz (blue lines) and 1 GHz (red lines). In both scenarios the cores run at 1 GHz, executing the qsort benchmark taken from the MiBench suite [16]. It is obvious that the contention is lowered when the NoC operates at the higher frequency, a benefit paid in terms of time and power.…”
Section: Motivational Examplementioning
confidence: 99%