2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MHz-rate scanned-wavelength direct absorption spectroscopy using a distributed feedback diode laser at 2.3 µm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given that commercial laser drivers are designed and built to minimize the risk of instability over a wide range of loads, the phase error resulting from the components used to achieve this stability results in a lower bandwidth than might be achieved by the laser. For quantum cascade lasers, injection current controllers with current range on the order of 1 Amp have typical modulation bandwidths on the order of 10 5 Hz [29], lower than can be achieved with diode laser controllers [30].…”
Section: Opto-electronic Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given that commercial laser drivers are designed and built to minimize the risk of instability over a wide range of loads, the phase error resulting from the components used to achieve this stability results in a lower bandwidth than might be achieved by the laser. For quantum cascade lasers, injection current controllers with current range on the order of 1 Amp have typical modulation bandwidths on the order of 10 5 Hz [29], lower than can be achieved with diode laser controllers [30].…”
Section: Opto-electronic Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in Figure a, the impact of different processing stages on the experimental results is clear: the methane sensor with the enhancement of AOGAM achieved the highest coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.99989) and is followed by the methane sensor assisted only by the NSF ( R 2 = 0.95122), while the methane sensor without any optimizing process was the most unreliable ( R 2 = 0.85738); the differences are statistically significant at P < 0.005. Unlike the AOGAM, the other two methods must convert the measured transmission spectra into absorbance spectra, then subsequently perform the Voigt profile fitting on the absorbance spectra, and finally calculate the concentration corresponding to the peak, which will inevitably introduce interferential errors. , The experimental results demonstrate that the method of extracting only the maximum absorbance value brings greater fluctuation and unreliability to the measured methane concentrations, especially in the dynamic measurements with time-varying noise. In contrast, the NCR that extracts information from the whole spectrum (dimensionally reduced spectrum) constructs afresh the mapping function between the full spectrum and its corresponding concentration, thus avoiding distortions introduced by processing with prior knowledge.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the AOGAM, the other two methods must convert the measured transmission spectra into absorbance spectra, then subsequently perform the Voigt profile fitting on the absorbance spectra, and finally calculate the concentration corresponding to the peak, which will inevitably introduce interferential errors. 18,40 The experimental results demonstrate that the method of extracting only the maximum absorbance value brings greater fluctuation and unreliability to the measured methane concentrations, especially in the dynamic measurements with time-varying noise. In contrast, the NCR that extracts information from the whole spectrum (dimensionally reduced spectrum) constructs afresh the mapping function between the full spectrum and its corresponding concentration, thus avoiding distortions introduced by processing with prior knowledge.…”
Section: Neural Concentration Retrievermentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations