2005
DOI: 10.5194/acp-5-2267-2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mexico City basin wind circulation during the MCMA-2003 field campaign

Abstract: Abstract. MCMA-2003 was a major field campaign investigating the atmospheric chemistry of the Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA) in April of 2003. This paper describes the wind circulation patterns during the campaign both within the Mexico City basin and on the regional scale. ''Time roses'' are introduced to concisely analyze the diurnal wind patterns. Three episode types were identified that explain the conditions encountered: ''O3-South'', ''Cold Surge'' and ''O3-North''. These can be diagnosed from a co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
98
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Popocatepetl Volcano (Popo, see Figure 1) is located 67 km southeast from the center of the MCMA; however, it is usually a minor source, on a regional scale, of SO 2 impacting the MCMA [9,34]. Given that sulfate is formed in a regional scale [13,18], a larger fraction of this component could also indicate that the aerosol was more aged than in other sites during previous campaigns, which is consistent with the patterns of air circulation that have been described in the Mexico City basin by de Foy et al [35] during the month of April 2003 for the MCMA03 campaign. The same patterns were observed during the MILAGRO campaign in 2006 [36], and are expected to have occurred during ACU15 because the three campaigns occurred in the dry season.…”
Section: Nr-pm1 Chemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Popocatepetl Volcano (Popo, see Figure 1) is located 67 km southeast from the center of the MCMA; however, it is usually a minor source, on a regional scale, of SO 2 impacting the MCMA [9,34]. Given that sulfate is formed in a regional scale [13,18], a larger fraction of this component could also indicate that the aerosol was more aged than in other sites during previous campaigns, which is consistent with the patterns of air circulation that have been described in the Mexico City basin by de Foy et al [35] during the month of April 2003 for the MCMA03 campaign. The same patterns were observed during the MILAGRO campaign in 2006 [36], and are expected to have occurred during ACU15 because the three campaigns occurred in the dry season.…”
Section: Nr-pm1 Chemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Atmosphere 2018, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 15 indicate that the aerosol was more aged than in other sites during previous campaigns, which is consistent with the patterns of air circulation that have been described in the Mexico City basin by de Foy et al [35] during the month of April 2003 for the MCMA03 campaign. The same patterns were observed during the MILAGRO campaign in 2006 [36], and are expected to have occurred during ACU15 because the three campaigns occurred in the dry season.…”
Section: Nr-pm1 Chemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Six types of days were identified according to basin-scale circulations, providing a way for attributing meteorological effects on observed changes in trace gases and particulate matter during the field campaign, in contrast to three episode types for MCMA-2003(de Foy et al, 2005. Well-defined drainage flows into the basin were observed every morning.…”
Section: Local Circulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare measurements of NO 2 from the standard chemiluminescence analyzer equipped with a molybdenum converter with those from a collocated Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) instrument. These measurements are available from the Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA) field campaign [de Foy et al, 2005;Molina et al, 2007] held in April/May of 2003. The chemiluminescence analyzer was calibrated as described by Dunlea et al [2007].…”
Section: Comparison With Doas Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%