The Handbook of Language and Globalization 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9781444324068.ch26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metroethnicities and Metrolanguages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The past two decades have seen a rise in terminology to explain such practices in order to understand how individuals, by drawing on a language, multiple languages or even specific features of a variety to index their socio--cultural and dynamic identities, where meaning emerges, is negotiated and thus contingent on social interaction. 8 In their seminal work on metrolingualism, which draws on Maher's (2005Maher's ( , 2010 conceptualizations of metroethnicity and metrolanguage, Otsuji and Pennycook define metrolingualism as:…”
Section: A Planned Metrolingual Artifact and Linguoingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past two decades have seen a rise in terminology to explain such practices in order to understand how individuals, by drawing on a language, multiple languages or even specific features of a variety to index their socio--cultural and dynamic identities, where meaning emerges, is negotiated and thus contingent on social interaction. 8 In their seminal work on metrolingualism, which draws on Maher's (2005Maher's ( , 2010 conceptualizations of metroethnicity and metrolanguage, Otsuji and Pennycook define metrolingualism as:…”
Section: A Planned Metrolingual Artifact and Linguoingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We draw first of all on an understanding of metrolingualism, a term originally developed by extending the notion of metroethnicity (Maher , ) to refer to ‘creative linguistic conditions across space and borders of culture, history and politics, as a way to move beyond current terms such as multilingualism and multiculturalism’ (Otsuji and Pennycook : 244). From this earlier understanding which focused on ‘the ways in which people of different and mixed backgrounds use, play with and negotiate identities through language’ and ‘on languages as emergent from contexts of interaction’ rather than languages as systems (2010: 246), our research has reoriented the term away from a focus on playful or willful creativity towards an understanding of everyday language use in the city in order to understand and capture the broader dynamism of urban linguistic practices.…”
Section: Metrolingualism Repertoires and Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sociolinguistic and linguistic anthropological research of the past decade has seen a boom in studies of globalization and culture contact, with a focus on wide-ranging issues such as language commodification (Heller 2007(Heller , 2010, discursive construction of space and place (Blommaert, Collins, and Slembrouck 2005;Blommaert 2010), performance in linguistic contact situations (Bauman and Briggs 1990), linguistic landscaping (Jaworski and Thurlow 2010), and reconfigurations of ethnicity and identity (Maher 2005(Maher , 2010. These approaches, which jointly constitute the new field of sociolinguistics of globalization, introduce important methodological shifts in the way we approach and analyze language contact and change.…”
Section: Globalization As Border Crossingmentioning
confidence: 99%