Software Measurement 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-08949-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metrics Validation Proposals: A Structured Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The editors for part 3 of the standards, Jacquet and Abran, have also presented in [33] (not part of the standards) a process model for evaluating FSM methods. This model describes all processes and activities involved in the definition and validation of FSM methods.…”
Section: Evaluating Fsm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The editors for part 3 of the standards, Jacquet and Abran, have also presented in [33] (not part of the standards) a process model for evaluating FSM methods. This model describes all processes and activities involved in the definition and validation of FSM methods.…”
Section: Evaluating Fsm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In software measurement, three types of validation are distinguished [34]: validation of the design of a measurement method, validation of the application of a measurement method, and validation of the use of the measurement results. In this section, we analyze these types of validation and discuss their role in the evaluation of OOmFP.…”
Section: Evaluation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software measurements are often indirect so, they are open to disagreement [33]. There is lack of agreement framework of validation metrics [15]. The objective of software measures is to enhance the development of software [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%