1986
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1986.121.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metrically invariant measures on locally homogeneous spaces and hyperspaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Just like the Euclidean case, we call {K : In 1986 Bandt and Baraki [1] proved the following result, which in certain sense gave a negative answer to this problem. When n ≥ 2, there is no positive δ-finite Borel measure on {K n , · H } which is invariant with respect to all isometries in it.…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just like the Euclidean case, we call {K : In 1986 Bandt and Baraki [1] proved the following result, which in certain sense gave a negative answer to this problem. When n ≥ 2, there is no positive δ-finite Borel measure on {K n , · H } which is invariant with respect to all isometries in it.…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunatelly this is not so. Bandt and Baraki in [1] proved answering to a problem of McMullen [15] that there is no positive σ-finite Borel measure on it which is invariant with respect to all isometries of (K, δ h ) into itself. This result exclude the possibility of the existence of a natural volume-type measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curtis and Schori developing their theory, Boardman was developing the following early measure theoretical results concerning hyperspaces (see [7], [8] Despite this early progress, hyperspaces remained untouched in a measuretheoretical sense for over a decade, until Bandt and Baraki developed the following powerful theorem in [2].…”
Section: Historical Results Concerning Hyperspacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The simplest situation arises when the IFS maps are similitudes whose images satisfy a disjointness condition known as the strong separation condition (SSC). We formally define these two concepts with the following definitions.…”
Section: L¥(a) = U We(a) Eeementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation