2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10114-015-4386-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functionals on the spaces of convex bodies

Abstract: In geometry, there are several challenging problems studying numbers associated to convex bodies. For example, the packing density problem, the kissing number problem, the covering density problem, the packing-covering constant problem, Hadwiger's covering conjecture and Borsuk's partition conjecture. They are fundamental and fascinating problems about the same objects. However, up to now, both the methodology and the technique applied to them are essentially different. Therefore, a common foundation for them … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each pair , of convex bodies in , the Banach–Mazur distance (also called the Asplund metric , cf. [ 7 ]) between them is defined by Then is a compact metric space (cf. [ 8 ] and [ 7 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each pair , of convex bodies in , the Banach–Mazur distance (also called the Asplund metric , cf. [ 7 ]) between them is defined by Then is a compact metric space (cf. [ 8 ] and [ 7 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iz(γ 0 , γ 1 , γ 2 , κτ ) = e −ε/κτ dΘ = e −mgh/κτ sin( θ)d θd φ (9) where φ ∈ {0, tan −1 (γ 1 /γ 0 )}, (10) θ ∈ {0, tan −1 (γ 0 /γ 2 cos φ)}, (11) h = l 2 (γ 0 sin θ cos φ + γ 1 sin θ sin φ + γ 2 cos θ) (12) whose detailed derivations can be read from Ref. [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…saving the cost of computation and experimental testing. This method may also find application to the packing problems [9][10][11][12]. By pouring objects into a container (without shaking), the packing factor may be difficult to calculate without knowing the probability of each object landing in a particular configuration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%