2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsir.2021.100236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metric sexual dimorphism of the skull in Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies utilise X-ray images [ [98] , [99] , [100] , [101] , [102] ], MRI images [ 103 , 104 ], photography [ 105 ], and CT scans [ 56 , 102 , [106] , [107] , [108] ] of bony anatomy to either cluster or classify individuals’ age and biological sex. While the growing body of literature has presented ML algorithms with promising results, study sample sizes are often limited to below 500 individuals/scans [ 17 , 64 , 65 , 109 , 110 ]. Though small datasets may be sufficient for the training of machine learning algorithms, the generalisability, accuracy, validity, and reliability of developed ML and AI models can be greatly improved with larger high-quality datasets [ 111 ].The larger sample sizes that the pipeline is able to produce will allow ML and AI models to decrease variability in predictive accuracies and increase model robusticity [ 112 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies utilise X-ray images [ [98] , [99] , [100] , [101] , [102] ], MRI images [ 103 , 104 ], photography [ 105 ], and CT scans [ 56 , 102 , [106] , [107] , [108] ] of bony anatomy to either cluster or classify individuals’ age and biological sex. While the growing body of literature has presented ML algorithms with promising results, study sample sizes are often limited to below 500 individuals/scans [ 17 , 64 , 65 , 109 , 110 ]. Though small datasets may be sufficient for the training of machine learning algorithms, the generalisability, accuracy, validity, and reliability of developed ML and AI models can be greatly improved with larger high-quality datasets [ 111 ].The larger sample sizes that the pipeline is able to produce will allow ML and AI models to decrease variability in predictive accuracies and increase model robusticity [ 112 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of free web applications have been developed for sex estimation using the Coimbra Identified Skeletal Collection, such as CADOES that employs pelvic measurements (d'Oliveira Coelho & Curate, 2019), the Ammer‐Coelho application that focuses on the olecranon fossa of the humerus (Ammer et al, 2019), and CalcTalus that estimates sex based on measurements from the talus and calcaneus (Curate et al, 2021). Moreover, the SeuPF software estimates sex based on measurements of the proximal femur, using a reference sample from the Luís Lopes Collection (Portugal) (Curate et al, 2016), while the KKU Sex Estimation online tool focuses on craniometric sex estimation for Thai populations (Techataweewan et al, 2021). Finally, 3D‐ID employs geometric morphometric data in sex estimation based on the cranium, using as reference data landmark coordinates from various ancestral groups (Slice & Ross, 2009), COLIPR performs sex estimation also based on cranial landmarks or/and traditional cranial measurements (Urbanová et al, 2014), while SkullProfiler adopts elliptical Fourier analysis for sex estimation from lateral skull photographs based on American and Asian assemblages (Caple et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the SeuPF software estimates sex based on measurements of the proximal femur, using a reference sample from the Luís Lopes Collection (Portugal) (Curate et al, 2016), while the KKU Sex Estimation online tool focuses on craniometric sex estimation for Thai populations (Techataweewan et al, 2021). Finally, 3D-ID employs geometric morphometric data in sex estimation based on the cranium, using as reference data landmark coordinates from various ancestral groups (Slice & Ross, 2009), COLIPR performs sex estimation also based on cranial landmarks or/and traditional cranial measurements (Urbanová et al, 2014), while SkullProfiler adopts elliptical Fourier analysis for sex estimation from lateral skull photographs based on American and Asian assemblages (Caple et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the morphological measurement is related to the observation of visual criteria [3]. Some parts of the body skeleton that are usually analyzed in determining sex are the pelvic [8][9][10][11], skull [12][13][14][15], mandible [16], cranial [17], femur [18][19][20][21], and tibia [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%