Abstract:Skeletal sex estimation is an essential step in any osteoarcheological study; hence, several metric and morphological methods have been developed for this purpose, employing different skeletal elements. This paper has a dual purpose: (1) test the performance of several machine learning classification models for skeletal sex estimation using worldwide samples of cranial and postcranial measurements and (2) present a free web application for the implementation of the models that exhibit the highest accuracy so t… Show more
“…Many times, the mandible can survive conditions that other bones in the human body cannot due to its robust nature [ 21 ]. There has been a movement toward developing easy‐to‐use, validated software‐based approaches for forensic skeletal analysis (e.g., FORDISC [ 23 ], CRANID [ 36 ]; SexEst [ 37 ]), but these software have tended to focus on the cranium or post‐cranial elements. To improve ease of evaluating a forensic profile from mandibular material, Berg and Kenyhercz [ 38 ] developed the (hu)MANid program, aimed at allowing sex and ancestry estimation using only mandibular features.…”
Human remains from forensic and bioarcheological contexts are often fragmentary, requiring methods for estimating a forensic profile that are based upon limited skeletal features. In 2017, Berg and Keryhercz created an online application, (hu)MANid, that provides sex and ancestry estimation from mandibular morphoscopic traits and linear measurements. In this study, we examine the utility of the (hu)MANid application in a diverse, urban US adult sample (aged 20–45; n = 143) derived from computed tomography (CT) scans. We secondarily conduct a preliminary analysis of the program's utility in a sample of adolescents (aged 15–17; n = 40). Six morphoscopic, and eleven morphometric traits were recorded as directed by the literature associated with the (hu)MANid program. Percent correct classification and posterior predictive values were calculated for the sex and ancestry estimations output by the program; chi‐squared tests were employed to compare self‐reported and predicted ancestry. In the adult sample, sex was accurately predicted for 75.52% of the sample. Ancestry prediction, however, was less favorable ranging from 19.3% to 50% correct. For the adolescent sample, correct sex estimation (45%) did not surpass what could occur by chance alone, though ancestry prediction fared better than in the larger adult sample (percent correct prediction overall average: 47.5%, range 35.71%–71.43%). The (hu)MANid application shows utility for use with CT scan‐derived adult samples for sex estimation, but caution is warranted for ancestry estimation and use with samples that may not have reached full adult maturity.
“…Many times, the mandible can survive conditions that other bones in the human body cannot due to its robust nature [ 21 ]. There has been a movement toward developing easy‐to‐use, validated software‐based approaches for forensic skeletal analysis (e.g., FORDISC [ 23 ], CRANID [ 36 ]; SexEst [ 37 ]), but these software have tended to focus on the cranium or post‐cranial elements. To improve ease of evaluating a forensic profile from mandibular material, Berg and Kenyhercz [ 38 ] developed the (hu)MANid program, aimed at allowing sex and ancestry estimation using only mandibular features.…”
Human remains from forensic and bioarcheological contexts are often fragmentary, requiring methods for estimating a forensic profile that are based upon limited skeletal features. In 2017, Berg and Keryhercz created an online application, (hu)MANid, that provides sex and ancestry estimation from mandibular morphoscopic traits and linear measurements. In this study, we examine the utility of the (hu)MANid application in a diverse, urban US adult sample (aged 20–45; n = 143) derived from computed tomography (CT) scans. We secondarily conduct a preliminary analysis of the program's utility in a sample of adolescents (aged 15–17; n = 40). Six morphoscopic, and eleven morphometric traits were recorded as directed by the literature associated with the (hu)MANid program. Percent correct classification and posterior predictive values were calculated for the sex and ancestry estimations output by the program; chi‐squared tests were employed to compare self‐reported and predicted ancestry. In the adult sample, sex was accurately predicted for 75.52% of the sample. Ancestry prediction, however, was less favorable ranging from 19.3% to 50% correct. For the adolescent sample, correct sex estimation (45%) did not surpass what could occur by chance alone, though ancestry prediction fared better than in the larger adult sample (percent correct prediction overall average: 47.5%, range 35.71%–71.43%). The (hu)MANid application shows utility for use with CT scan‐derived adult samples for sex estimation, but caution is warranted for ancestry estimation and use with samples that may not have reached full adult maturity.
“…However, most available software cannot handle missing values and/or uses population‐specific reference standards. This work aimed to examine the reliability of the open‐access SexEst software (Constantinou & Nikita, 2022), which has been developed based on a global sample of mostly preindustrial skeletal reference material, on a modern Greek population. Note that despite the global nature of the SexEst training dataset, its reference database does not include any Greek samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, the DSP2 software (Bru ˚žek et al, 2017) focuses on pelvic traits, while the SexEst software employs cranial and postcranial measurements collected from individuals with diverse ancestry (Constantinou & Nikita, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It additionally estimates sex based on postcranial measurements, but the reference sample consists of American Black and American White individuals (Manthey & Jantz, 2020). Correspondingly, the DSP2 software (Brůžek et al, 2017) focuses on pelvic traits, while the SexEst software employs cranial and postcranial measurements collected from individuals with diverse ancestry (Constantinou & Nikita, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, in cases of incomplete datasets, the users must select one of the LDA models that predict sex with fewer variables. For a detailed description of the machine learning procedure and the overall development of the SexEst software, please see Constantinou and Nikita (2022).…”
Sex estimation from human skeletal remains is fundamental in osteoarcheology and forensic anthropology. The increasing availability of reference skeletal collections across the world has allowed the development of morphological and metric methods for skeletal sex estimation, some of which may be implemented in specialized computer software. The present study aims to evaluate the freely available SexEst software, which utilizes cranial and postcranial measurements, and different classification models for sex estimation, on a contemporary Greek population comprising of 227 (126 males and 101 females) adult individuals. After the calculation of intra‐observer error to assess the repeatability of the measurements, the proposed variables were tested for classification accuracy individually and in different combinations. Based on the results, the postcranial models outperformed the cranial ones in all cases and can be adequately applied on a Greek population sample. The light gradient boosting (LGB) algorithm yielded the highest correct classification rates when no missing values exist, while the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models should only be used when dealing with missing data. The highest classification accuracy for a 0.65 posterior probability threshold was reached when utilizing a combination of postcranial variables (89.67%), while the lowest was achieved with the cranial measurement “Glabella‐occipital length” (45.00%). The same models yielded the highest and lowest accuracy for a 0.5 probability threshold, with values of 92.96% and 67.73%, respectively. Combining variables yielded higher accuracies in both skeletal regions, suggesting that the software would be more helpful in cases of intact skeletons. The loss of classification accuracy due to population specificity further corroborates the need to include different ancestries in sex estimation software.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.