2015
DOI: 10.1111/cod.12449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylisothiazolinone in selected consumer products in Belgium: Adding fuel to the fire?

Abstract: Cosmetics and detergents may facilitate contact sensitization because of a (too) high MI concentration, and mislabelling may make its avoidance extremely difficult. Safer use concentrations and correct labelling should be ensured by adequate quality control.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
2
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
53
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, leave‐on products with MI exceeding the legal limits were also reported by Aerts et al and Neza and Cetini , and represent a serious concern. The MCI concentrations in cosmetics were relatively low, with an average value of 4.8 ppm, which is comparable to the most recent studies in Belgium, Spain, and the United States . As expected, the MI concentrations (average value of 58 ppm) were higher than those of MCI in cosmetics, and these findings are comparable with those of , but higher than those of , in which a sample of five shampoos had been investigated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, leave‐on products with MI exceeding the legal limits were also reported by Aerts et al and Neza and Cetini , and represent a serious concern. The MCI concentrations in cosmetics were relatively low, with an average value of 4.8 ppm, which is comparable to the most recent studies in Belgium, Spain, and the United States . As expected, the MI concentrations (average value of 58 ppm) were higher than those of MCI in cosmetics, and these findings are comparable with those of , but higher than those of , in which a sample of five shampoos had been investigated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The MCI concentrations in cosmetics were relatively low, with an average value of 4.8 ppm, which is comparable to the most recent studies in Belgium, Spain, and the United States . As expected, the MI concentrations (average value of 58 ppm) were higher than those of MCI in cosmetics, and these findings are comparable with those of , but higher than those of , in which a sample of five shampoos had been investigated. The results of Alvarez‐Rivera et al are comparable for rinse‐off products but not for leave‐on products, which showed higher MI concentrations in Switzerland (average of 98 ppm) than in Spain (average of 7.2 ppm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Briefly, 5 ml of the gel mask was dissolved in 20 ml of physiological saline, and this aqueous solution was subsequently used for the spot test. Four other cosmetics, that is, three positive controls containing MI, and one negative control free from MI that had been previously investigated by the use of high‐performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC‐UV) , were all correctly identified with regard to their MI content by use of this experimental detection method.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While EU legislation restricts the maximum concentration of isothiazolinones in cosmetics, and imposes adequate labelling of cosmetics and domestic products, several publications have reported MI exceeding 100 ppm, the maximum permitted concentrations, mislabelling or absent information concerning the use of either MCI/MI or MI in several products, and in cosmetics regarded as ‘natural’ …”
Section: Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%