1983
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.19835051018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methyldixanthogenatostibane

Abstract: Inhaltsübersicht. Methyldixanthogenatostibane CHgSb(S2CORh erhält man entweder durch Reaktion von Methyldibromstiban mit entsprechenden Natriumxanthogenaten bei tiefen Temperaturen (-78°C) oder durch Einschiebung von CS 2 in Methyldialkoxistibane. Die Röntgenstrukturanalyse von CHaSb(S2COC2H5h zeigt, daß Im Kristall die Chelatliganden das Antimonatom intraund intermolekular koordinieren, so daß eine pentagonal-pyramidale bzw. unter Einbezug des freien Elektronenpaars pentagonal-bipyramidale Koordination am Ant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar structures were reported by Wieber et al, who prepared [{Cp(CO) 2 Fe}Bi(SCSOMe) 2 ] and [{Cp(CO) 2 Fe}Bi(S 2 CNEt 2 ) 2 ], the latter containing two four-membered rings based around the bismuth atom [56]. Mono-iron species have also been reported for the dibromo-, diiodo-, and dimethylbismuth analogues [5,53,56]. The related trimetal species [Cp(CO)(Me 3 P)Fe(BiMe 2 )] 2 Mo(CO) 4 was prepared by Malisch in 1983, by the reaction of [{Cp(CO)(PMe 3 )Fe}BiMe 2 ] with the norbornadiene molybdenum carbonyl complex (Scheme 4) [57].…”
Section: Synthesis and Reactivity Of Iron-containing Speciessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar structures were reported by Wieber et al, who prepared [{Cp(CO) 2 Fe}Bi(SCSOMe) 2 ] and [{Cp(CO) 2 Fe}Bi(S 2 CNEt 2 ) 2 ], the latter containing two four-membered rings based around the bismuth atom [56]. Mono-iron species have also been reported for the dibromo-, diiodo-, and dimethylbismuth analogues [5,53,56]. The related trimetal species [Cp(CO)(Me 3 P)Fe(BiMe 2 )] 2 Mo(CO) 4 was prepared by Malisch in 1983, by the reaction of [{Cp(CO)(PMe 3 )Fe}BiMe 2 ] with the norbornadiene molybdenum carbonyl complex (Scheme 4) [57].…”
Section: Synthesis and Reactivity Of Iron-containing Speciessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similar structures were reported by Wieber et al, who prepared [{Cp(CO) 2 Fe}Bi(SCSOMe) 2 ] and [{Cp(CO) 2 Fe}Bi(S 2 CNEt 2 ) 2 ], the latter containing two four-membered rings based around the bismuth atom [56]. Mono-iron species have also been reported for the dibromo-, diiodo-, and dimethylbismuth analogues [5,53,56].…”
Section: Synthesis and Reactivity Of Iron-containing Speciessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Compounds containing Fe–Bi bonds, have been accessed in the past by different routes, which are briefly exemplified here focussing on bismuthanes bearing a bismuth atom linked via a Fe–Bi bond to organoiron fragments, such as the well‐known η 5 ‐cyclopentadienyl dicarbonyl iron anion [Fp – = ( η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )(CO) 2 Fe – ]. Two routes to compounds like [{( η 5 ‐C 5 H 4 R )(CO) 2 Fe}BiMe 2 ] ( R = H), [{( η 5 ‐C 5 H 4 R)(CO) 2 Fe} 2 Bi X ] ( R = H, X = Cl, Br; R = Me, X = Cl) and [{( η 5 ‐C 5 H 4 R )(CO) 2 Fe} 3 Bi] ( R = H, Me) have been established so far: (i) salt metathesis reactions treating bismuth halides with alkali metal salts of [Fp] – [27–30] or (ii) cleavage of the Fe–Fe bond in the [Fp 2 ] dimer in reactions with bismuth halides or bismuth dithiocarbamates as first reported by Cullen and co‐workers in 1971 for the synthesis of [FpBiCl 2 ] and later for the synthesis of [FpBi X 2 ] [ X = SC(S)NEt 2 , SC(S)OMe] by Wieber and co‐workers . The latter approach was recently successfully adapted by Mehring and co‐workers to access [Fp R BiBr 2 ] {Fp R = Fp; Fp t Bu [( η 5 ‐C 5 H 3 ‐1,3‐ t Bu 2 )(CO) 2 Fe]; Fp* [( η 5 ‐C 5 Me 5 )(CO) 2 Fe]} starting from [Fp R 2 ] and BiBr 3 (Scheme ) and also by us to synthesize the carboxylates [FpBi(O 2 C R ) 2 ] 2 via reaction of [Fp 2 ] with [Bi(O 2 CR) 3 ] [ R = H ( VII ), CH 3 ( VIII ), t Bu ( IX )] (Scheme ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons can be made with the following structures: Sb(SzCOEt)3 (Gottardi, 1961;Hoskins, Tiekink & Winter, 1985), containing asymmetrically chelating ligands [Sb--S 2.511 (2) and 3.002 (3),~] related by a threefold axis, but no short intermolecular contacts; SbMe(S2COEt)2 (Wieber, Wirth & Burschka, 1983), again containing asymmetrically chelating ligands [Sb---S 2.581 (2)/2.834 (2) and 2.617 (2)/2.904 (2) A] and, as in (1), an intermolecular Sb...S contact [3.353 (2)~,], which raises the antimony coordination number to six and links the molecules into infinite chains; the dithiocarbamate SbMe(S2CNEt2)2 (Wieber, Wirth, Metter & Burschka, 1985), which has a similar structure [Sb---S 2.554 (2)/2.960 (2) and 2.538 (2)/2.904 (2) ,~], but the intermolecular contacts [Sb--.S 3.847 (2) A] are much weaker, giving loose dimers in the solid; and SbPh[SzP(Oipr)2] (Gupta, Rai, Mehrotra, Jain, Hopkins & Tiekink, 1985), which contains independent molecules and again asymmetrically chelating lig oands [Sb--S 2.516 (3)/3.056 (2) and 2.529 (3)/3.067 (3) A].…”
Section: °A Srmentioning
confidence: 99%