2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methyl farnesoate epoxidase (mfe) gene expression and juvenile hormone titers in the life cycle of a highly eusocial stingless bee, Melipona scutellaris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For T. angustula we found supporting evidence of the involvement of vg in nursing behaviour, nonetheless JH genes were not highly expressed in foragers. This supports the hypothesis that in stingless bees the typical vg/ JH double repressor network observed in honeybees is also not functional, and vg is distinctly regulated 32,38 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For T. angustula we found supporting evidence of the involvement of vg in nursing behaviour, nonetheless JH genes were not highly expressed in foragers. This supports the hypothesis that in stingless bees the typical vg/ JH double repressor network observed in honeybees is also not functional, and vg is distinctly regulated 32,38 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, downstream analyses (e.g., GO term enrichment, gene network analyses and metabolic pathway comparisons) will also be affected, possibly leading to wrong conclusions. The use of age‐confounded data sets might therefore have contributed to the lack of consensus on clear transcriptomic patterns of worker specialized on different behaviours, as many studies investigating gene expression in different behavioural castes did not control for age and fertility (Cardoso‐Júnior et al, ; Feldmeyer et al, ; Ingram et al, ; Johnson & Jasper, ; Khamis et al, ; Manfredini et al, ; Qiu et al, ; Scheiner, Entler, et al, ; Scheiner, Reim, et al, ; Zhao et al, ). Similar conclusions were recently drawn from a gene expression comparison between queens and workers, as uncontrolled variation was added by confounding age when comparing gene expression between castes (Lucas et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inconsistency across studies in the association between gene expression and worker task choice may reflect species‐specific mechanisms regulating behavioural specialization or differences across studies regarding experimental design. Gene expression patterns associated with behavioural specialization of workers are typically identified by comparing brood carers and foragers that not only differ in behaviour but also in age and fertility (Cardoso‐Júnior et al, ; Feldmeyer et al, ; Ingram et al, ; Johnson & Jasper, ; Khamis et al, ; Manfredini et al, ; Qiu et al, ; Scheiner, Entler, Barron, Scholl, & Thamm, ; Zhao et al, ), two factors that are linked to gene expression (Alaux et al, ; Feldmeyer et al, ; Harrison, Hammond, & Mallon, ; Lucas, Romiguier, & Keller, ; Nilsen et al, ; Whitfield, Cziko, & Robinson, ). Not experimentally controlling for age or fertility (in species with potentially fertile workers) when contrasting brood carer and forager transcriptomes could thus lead to confounded data sets and the identification of transcriptomic patterns being linked to any of the three factors or combinations thereof.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of age confounded datasets might therefore have contributed to the lack of consensus on clear transcriptomic patterns of worker behaviour, as many studies investigating gene expression in different behavioural castes did not control for age and fertility [e.g. 28,31,56,57,6973]. Similar conclusions were recently drawn from a gene expression comparison between queens and workers, as uncontrolled variation was added by confounding age when comparing gene expression between both castes [68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As age and fertility additionally influence gene expression [22,28,67,68], studies that did not experimentally control for age and physiology when comparing gene expression between brood carers and foragers [e.g. 28,31,46,56,57,6973] might have produced results driven not only by behaviour, but also by age and fertility. Such confounded transcriptomic analyses are not a problem specific to research on insect behaviour but occur across study systems and contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%