2015
DOI: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of sampling airborne fungi in working environments of waste treatment facilities

Abstract: Both methods showed comparable sensitivity to the fluctuations of the concentrations of airborne fungi during the work shifts. The SAS method is adequate for a fast indicative determination of concentration of airborne fungi. The MF method is suitable for thorough assessment of working environment contamination by airborne fungi. Therefore we recommend the MF method for the implementation of a uniform standard methodology of airborne fungi sampling in working environments of waste treatment facilities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of fungi generally increase in spring and peak in summer 88,89 , although results are diverse in the literature. Černá et al 90 had higher fungi concentrations in spring in comparison to winter, while Nadal et al 91 presented higher values of bioaerosols in summer. When analysing different environments than the ones studied in this research, Gonçalves et al 92 found higher values at the beginning of spring in São Paulo, while Emygdio et al 93 presented a higher number of total spores in spring, but different genera had a large variability regarding seasonal characterization.…”
Section: Bioaerosols Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Concentrations of fungi generally increase in spring and peak in summer 88,89 , although results are diverse in the literature. Černá et al 90 had higher fungi concentrations in spring in comparison to winter, while Nadal et al 91 presented higher values of bioaerosols in summer. When analysing different environments than the ones studied in this research, Gonçalves et al 92 found higher values at the beginning of spring in São Paulo, while Emygdio et al 93 presented a higher number of total spores in spring, but different genera had a large variability regarding seasonal characterization.…”
Section: Bioaerosols Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The sampling period per 1 sample was 24 min. Thus, the amount of sampled air was 120 l. Sampling and subsequent processing of samples were performed according to methods described by Černá et al [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, comparing the results of these studies is complicated due to the different sampling methods, sample processing applied and other sources of variation (see Černá et al [17], Eduarda and Heederik [25] for discussion of the problem). However, the concentrations of airborne fungi in this study were clearly higher (2-4 orders of magnitude) to those found in other indoor environments [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Concentrations Of Airborne Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the sampling time must be adequate to the environment in study and work tasks being developed. For example when using high volume samplers in highly contaminated areas, it is crucial to employ short sampling intervals and lower flow rates for airborne fungal sampling [64]. Nevertheless, active sampling methods, namely impaction devices, have already proved to be very useful in the characterization of occupational exposure to fungi in several studies, by presenting the most diversified fungal contamination in comparison with all sampling methods applied [28,51,61,65,66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%