1965
DOI: 10.1159/000464966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods in Quantitative Hemagglutination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our goal was to perfect a precise and reproducible method to detect and quantitate heterogeneity of antigen expression on the red cell membrane. Counting unagglutinated red cells using a haemocytometer or an electronic particle counter (Coulter) (Solomon et al, 1965) made it possible to measure the relationship between response and dose of antigen, and to construct regression lines from which the 50% haemagglutinating dose (HD50) of the antibody and the slope of the curve could be calculated (Wilkie & Becker, 1955). The maximum precision we achieved with the D-anti-D reaction using the Coulter model B Electronic Particle counter was f 3.5% (Greenwalt et al, 1965).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal was to perfect a precise and reproducible method to detect and quantitate heterogeneity of antigen expression on the red cell membrane. Counting unagglutinated red cells using a haemocytometer or an electronic particle counter (Coulter) (Solomon et al, 1965) made it possible to measure the relationship between response and dose of antigen, and to construct regression lines from which the 50% haemagglutinating dose (HD50) of the antibody and the slope of the curve could be calculated (Wilkie & Becker, 1955). The maximum precision we achieved with the D-anti-D reaction using the Coulter model B Electronic Particle counter was f 3.5% (Greenwalt et al, 1965).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a dilute system it is difficult to obtain equilibrium between the antigen and the antibody before the addition of the erythrocytes, and subsequently to obtain equilibrium between the residual antibody and the antigens on the erythrocytes that have been added in the second part of the test. Furthermore there is not a linear relationship between the degree of agglutination and thc amount of residual antibody at low concentrations (Solomon, Gibbs and Bowdler, 1965). This is due to a 'tailing' in the titration caused by variations in the binding constant of the antibody present in a sample which may be as niucli as a hundred-fold (Hughes Jones, 1967).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity of agglutination has seldom been exploited in the quantitative assay of antigens rather than that of antibodies [6,71. Advantage may, however, be taken of the accuracy and reproducibility of electronic particle counting procedures which, applied to the study of agglutination kinetics, may provide information of interest about the red cell antigenic makeup.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%