2019
DOI: 10.3390/toxics7030037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for the Identification of Outliers and Their Influence on Exposure Assessment in Agricultural Pesticide Applicators: A Proposed Approach and Validation Using Biological Monitoring

Abstract: The “patch” approach for skin exposure assessment can easily be combined with biological monitoring in real-life pesticide studies. Nevertheless, this approach is sensitive to outliers, with values markedly deviating from other members of the sample, which can result in a gross overestimation of exposure. This study aimed at developing methods for outlier identification and validating them while using biological monitoring. Twenty-seven workers applying mancozeb in Italian vineyards participated in this study.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Each experimental arm (sham, empty implant, hIL‐4 implant) included eight mice before the exclusion of outliers. Statistical outliers were determined using the boxplot method previously described (Mandić‐Rajčević et al, 2019). Using this method, numerical data were first graphically analyzed, and outliers were determined as data points that were located outside 1.5 times the interquartile range above the upper quartile and below the lower quartile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each experimental arm (sham, empty implant, hIL‐4 implant) included eight mice before the exclusion of outliers. Statistical outliers were determined using the boxplot method previously described (Mandić‐Rajčević et al, 2019). Using this method, numerical data were first graphically analyzed, and outliers were determined as data points that were located outside 1.5 times the interquartile range above the upper quartile and below the lower quartile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low exposure/risk introduces an unavoidable degree of uncertainty in the calculation, due to extrapolating the trend of exposure and excretion over two orders of magnitude. The assessment of the internal dose from available body deposition data relied on dealing with several sources of variability that include different deposition in the body areas, different duration of pesticide permanence on the skin, and a generic number for skin absorption coefficient (Mandić-Rajčević and Colosio, 2019;Mandic-Rajcevic et al, 2019;SANCO, 2009). Technical improvements in each of these aspects will increase the accuracy of the approach and the assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the assessment of mancozeb deposition on the skin and the estimate of the absorbed dose, we examined the analytical results to identify and treat outliers. Outliers that could influence the estimate of the skin dose were identified and treated using the modified Z score according to our previously proposed and published procedure (Mandić-Rajčević and Colosio, 2019;Mandic-Rajcevic et al, 2019). This processing improved the correlation…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same can be observed in the mathematical model of the median absolute deviation (MAD) [ 57 , 58 ] where the limitations are given by the threshold values from the median value. The threshold value chosen for Interquartile range (IQR) method testing is 1.5 [ 59 ] and for median is 3. The advantage of using the IQR and median absolute deviation (MAD) models is more related with ‘tracking’ and maintaining a permeant control spread that will identify the extreme values for most of the cases.…”
Section: Applied Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%