2019
DOI: 10.1134/s0005117919080101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Solving of the Aircraft Landing Problem. II. Approximate Solution Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constraints (3) and (4) restrict the maximum possible advance and delay respectively. Constraints ( 5)- (7) represent the relation between the continuous variables. Constraints (8) express the precedence relationship between aircraft.…”
Section: Complete Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constraints (3) and (4) restrict the maximum possible advance and delay respectively. Constraints ( 5)- (7) represent the relation between the continuous variables. Constraints (8) express the precedence relationship between aircraft.…”
Section: Complete Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bennell et al [2] proposed in 2010 a comprehensive overview of the approaches from the literature. Recently, Veresnikov et al published two surveys on the ALP [6,7]. The first one focuses on some exact approaches to the ALP (mainly mixed-integer programming), and the second one overviews mainly genetic and memetic algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During nearly three decades of development, the research on ASSP attracted considerable attention from many researchers. Some research treated the ASSP as a static case [3] and others as a dynamic case [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]; some research tackled the ASSP from a deterministic perspective and others from a stochastic perspective [11][12][13][14]; some research concerned the appeals of one single stakeholder (i.e., single-objective optimization) [15][16][17][18] and others multiple stakeholders (i.e., multiple-objectives optimization) [19][20][21][22][23]; some research solved the ASSP by exact solution methods [3,19,[24][25][26][27][28] (e.g., Beasley used solvers such as CPLEX and Briskorn used model language such as GAMS) and others by approximate solution methods [29], including the simulated annealing algorithm [18,30], genetic algorithm [31,32], ant colony optimization algorithm [33], imperialist competitive algorithm [34], local search algorithm [10], and so on; and some research only provided the optimized landing runway, sequence, and time, while others also proposed the advisories for air traffic controllers [22,[35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been studied in various mathematical formulations since the late 1970s. To date, a variety of formulations have been proposed, representing different sets of requirements of pilots and air traffic controllers (ATC) to the resulting flow (see, for example, [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] and references within).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%