2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2017.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for evaluating overconsolidation ratio from piezocone sounding results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the methods proposed in this paper, the predictions of equations (43) and (44) were compared with the results of in situ CPTU tests for marine soft clay in two coastal areas [23,24]. Moreover, the predictions of Wayne's method [12] and Chanmee's method [14] were also included in comparison with further interpretation of the reliability and superiority of the methods proposed in this paper. Table 2 lists the model input parameters used in the analyses.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Ocr Obtained From Two Methods Proposed In Is mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To validate the methods proposed in this paper, the predictions of equations (43) and (44) were compared with the results of in situ CPTU tests for marine soft clay in two coastal areas [23,24]. Moreover, the predictions of Wayne's method [12] and Chanmee's method [14] were also included in comparison with further interpretation of the reliability and superiority of the methods proposed in this paper. Table 2 lists the model input parameters used in the analyses.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Ocr Obtained From Two Methods Proposed In Is mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the solution of a spherical cavity expansion described with the modified cam clay, a modified approach to determine the OCR from CPTU was proposed. Chanmee et al [14] combined the undrained shear strength of the modified Cambridge model with the undrained shear strength based on the net cone tip resistance to determine the OCR of soil by the iteration convergence method, which is expressed as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…uCPT provides nearly continuous measurements of tip resistance (q t ), sleeve friction (f s ) and pore water pressure (u 2 ) at the shoulder of a cone (standard cone). These measurements can be used to estimate the undrained shear strength of a deposit (s u ) (Campanella and Robertson 1988; Teh and Houlsby 1991;Lu et al 2004), overconsolidation ratio (OCR) (Wroth 1984;Mayne and Kemper 1988;Robertson 1990;Chanmee et al 2017) and permeability of soil in the horizontal direction (k h ) (Robertson et al 1992;Lunne et al 1997;Sully et al 1999;Elsworth and Lee 2005;Robertson 2010;Chai et al 2011). The cone can be held at a predetermined depth to measure the pore pressure dissipation process, and these dissipation results can be used to estimate the coefficient of consolidation of the soil at that depth (Teh and Houlsby 1991;Robertson et al 1992;Burns and Mayne 1998;Chai et al 2012a;Chai et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%