2018
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2017-0058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified method for estimating permeability of clayey soils based on piezocone sounding results

Abstract: A modified method for estimating permeability of clayey deposits in the horizontal direction (kh) based on piezocone sounding (uCPT) results is proposed. Most of the currently available methods relate the value of kh with the Δu/[Formula: see text] ratio (Δu is the measured excess pore pressure from uCPT at the shoulder of the cone and [Formula: see text] is the initial vertical effective stress at the measurement location). However, it has been understood that the effect of the overconsolidation ratio (OCR) o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The k h estimated of h 3 * and h 5 * are around the design criteria. Joshi et al [29] and Chai et al [13] concluded that the k h estimated from CPTU are larger than those from laboratory tests. The reason can be explained as: (1) a small amount of water dissipates around the filter at the piezocone, whereas the permanent in laboratory tests are sufficiently supplied; (2) the permeation in laboratory tests is one-dimensional but the water pressure around the piezocone is three-dimensionally dissipated.…”
Section: Comparison With Soil Classification Based On Soil Behavior Typementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The k h estimated of h 3 * and h 5 * are around the design criteria. Joshi et al [29] and Chai et al [13] concluded that the k h estimated from CPTU are larger than those from laboratory tests. The reason can be explained as: (1) a small amount of water dissipates around the filter at the piezocone, whereas the permanent in laboratory tests are sufficiently supplied; (2) the permeation in laboratory tests is one-dimensional but the water pressure around the piezocone is three-dimensionally dissipated.…”
Section: Comparison With Soil Classification Based On Soil Behavior Typementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bennert et al [8] and Li et al [33] demonstrated that CPTU could be an effective tool in evaluating cutoff walls performance. Especially, the u 2 served as the key data in horizontal hydraulic permeability (k h ) evaluation (i.e., the main concern in cutoff wall performance) as previous researches conducted and verified [12,13,20,36,37]. However, there is no suitable in situ evaluation method based on u 2 for the k h profile of early cutoff wall, since the chemical reaction in early cutoff wall will quickly improve the impermeability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydraulic conductivity can be determined by using hydraulic field tests for bedrock aquifers, such as a pumping test, a slug test, and a water pressure test, and hydraulic field tests for unconsolidated formations, such as a con penetration test [44][45][46], a pumping test [47,48], a slug test, and a grain size analysis [49]. Specifically, the hydraulic conductivity of contaminated soils can be evaluated by [50,51].…”
Section: Hydrogeological Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the method is not applicable in highly dilatant materials. Experimental work by Chai and Chanmee (2017) with overconsolidated clay has confirmed this limitation.…”
Section: Subsequent Workmentioning
confidence: 92%