Advances in Nanomedicine for the Delivery of Therapeutic Nucleic Acids 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100557-6.00003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for characterization of nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
194
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 325 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
11
194
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of zeta potential (Table 1; top), all cellulose derivatives led to negatively charged particles, with average values around -29 mV. This result suggests moderate stability of the suspensions, meaning that the propensity to aggregate might not be a critical issue (Torchilin 2006;Kumar and Dixit 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In terms of zeta potential (Table 1; top), all cellulose derivatives led to negatively charged particles, with average values around -29 mV. This result suggests moderate stability of the suspensions, meaning that the propensity to aggregate might not be a critical issue (Torchilin 2006;Kumar and Dixit 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The surface charge of PVP-AgNPs and the physical stability of the colloidal nanodispersions were estimated by surface zeta potential (ζ) measurements ( Table 1). The ζ values express the electrical charge between the moving and stationary layers around colloidal particles [32]. Thus, it is possible to predict PVP-AgNPs stability and their ability to interact with a textile substrate.…”
Section: Dynamic Light Scattering (Dls)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anomalous exponent (α) ranged from strongly subdiffusive (α ≈ 0.1) to purely diffusive (α ≈ 1), but it was obtained only for a third of the dataset (n = 33, 30%). The zeta potential (ζ) measured the effective surface charge of particles in solution (Kumar and Dixit 2017). The values ranged from −70 mV to +40 mV and were obtained for half of the dataset (n = 57, 52%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%