2010
DOI: 10.1080/00207540903436703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for activating the decision-making process that is used for controlling flexible manufacturing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An FMS with a random arrival of parts for processing is equivalent to an automated dynamic job shop in conventional production (Sabuncuoglu 1998). It has been observed in the literature that the distribution of the part arrival process in dynamic job shops closely follows the Poisson distribution (Shanker and Tzen 1985, Ramasesh 1990, Sabuncuoglu 1998, Rangsaritratsamee et al 2004, Shnits 2010. Hence, the time between arrivals of parts is exponentially distributed.…”
Section: Part Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An FMS with a random arrival of parts for processing is equivalent to an automated dynamic job shop in conventional production (Sabuncuoglu 1998). It has been observed in the literature that the distribution of the part arrival process in dynamic job shops closely follows the Poisson distribution (Shanker and Tzen 1985, Ramasesh 1990, Sabuncuoglu 1998, Rangsaritratsamee et al 2004, Shnits 2010. Hence, the time between arrivals of parts is exponentially distributed.…”
Section: Part Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The mean of this exponential distribution is determined for a specified system utilisation percentage and the processing requirements of parts. For a dynamic job shop system, the following relationship is used to determine the mean interarrival time (Rangsaritratsamee et al 2004, Shnits 2010:…”
Section: Part Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation