Methodology for Selecting Best Management Practices Integrating Multiple Stakeholders and Criteria. Part 1: Methodology

Aceves, Mauricio Carvallo; Fuamba, Musandji

doi:10.3390/w8020055

Cited by 7 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and an analytical network process (ANP) are used to determine the weights for disaster potential for disaster-resistant communities on hillsides. e ANP, which is an extension of the AHP, adds feedback to the AHP to predict the internal relationships between all criteria, objectives, and projects using ratio scales, to allow robust decision-making processes [2,[17][18][19][20].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Potential for a Hillside Collapse for a Community in Changhua County, Taiwan

Liu

Tsai

Peng

2019

Advances in Civil Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To create communities that are resistant to disasters, public disaster prevention and response must be reinforced by promoting disaster prevention and knowledge and technology to ensure an adequate response through public participation. Promoting disaster prevention measures reduces the number of factors in communities that pertain to disasters. Changhua County contains 589 villages, 81 of which are prone to hillsides (including protected forest). In addition to original potential debris flow torrent communities, disaster-resistant communities have been established under the guidance of Soil and Water Conservation Bureau (SWCB), Council of Agriculture in Taiwan; Changhua County Government also plans to establish disaster-resistant communities in other hillside communities. This study proposes an expert questionnaire to determine the potential for a hillside disaster and uses an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and an analytical network process (ANP) to determine the weights of factors that pertain to potential disasters in hillside communities so that these communities can become resistant to disasters.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Potential for a Hillside Collapse for a Community in Changhua County, Taiwan

Liu

Tsai

Peng

2019

Advances in Civil Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, citizens are usually more sensitive in this case. Engineers, municipal governments and developers are somewhere between two these groups [9]. Stakeholders' opinion about TP removal is very similar to TN removal [9].…”

Section: Stormwater Quantity Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Multi-criteria Decision-making Framework for Selecting the Best Low Impact Development Techniques (LIDs)

Heidari¹

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Low impact Development (LID) techniques are known as a novel stormwater management approach designed to mitigate the adverse effects of stormwater runoff and nonpoint source pollution. This study proposes a methodology for selecting the best LIDs based on the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) while incorporating different stakeholder priorities. First, we characterize all main stakeholders so that their influences can be assessed. Second, relevant main criteria and sub-criteria are selected. Third, a stakeholder analysis is carried out to obtain social performance values and criteria priorities. Finally, two MCDA methods are applied to obtain the final LID rankings. The results show that the performance of infiltration practices and vegetated filter strips are reasonably good in stakeholders’ opinion. Subsequently, the performance of the soil restoration has a number of positive effects on stormwater quality and quantity function. Most of the ten LID techniques received ratings more than 3 from the Weighted Average Method (WAM) method (performing well) other than green roofs and constructed filters, and no techniques averaged lower than 2.29 out of 5. There is a general consensus on how vegetated filter strip and infiltration practices would perform, while there is little consensus on the bioretention, level spreaders, and porous pavements. The ratings show that the majority of stakeholders thought most LIDs would perform well (score of more than 3). While further investigations into the opinions held by main stakeholders of stormwater management of LID will be required, the results of this study provide an initial insight into how these results can be applied to support effective widespread LID implementation.

show abstract

“…ELECTRE dominant concordance matrix obtained from threshold of 0.73 that calculated by using equation (15). The equation ( 16) is used to find the dominant discordance matrix as in Table 13.…”

Section: Electre Dominant Discordance Matrixmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While research on TOPSIS sensitivity is found in studies [13][14] which change the weight of one attributes to determine the level of TOPSIS sensitivity. In [15][16] showed the level of validity generated by ELECTRE.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Topsis and Electre Comparison Analysis on Web-Based Software

Rivensin¹,

Jollyta

2021

kursor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Methods in the Decision Support System (DSS) have their own techniques in solving organizational problems. Determining the appropriate DSS method with the problem is a common difficulty experienced by organizations. The performance of a DSS method can be measured in various ways. This research aims to determine the performance of the two DSS methods, specifically Technique for Others Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Election at Choix Traduisant La Realite (ELECTRE) which are applied to the best lecturer selection system. The research was carried out on software designed using efficiency as one of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9126. The performance of both methods tested on validity and sensitivity testing. The results showed that the TOPSIS performance was better in terms of efficiency and sensitivity. TOPSIS execution time is 0.0085 seconds faster and has a greater sensitivity value of 2.18% compared to ELECTRE. Validity result gave the best results reaching 100% to ELECTRE. That means, the ELECTRE calculation can be trusted because it has a perfect level of accuracy.

show abstract

Methodology for Selecting Best Management Practices Integrating Multiple Stakeholders and Criteria. Part 1: Methodology

Cited by 7 publications

References 20 publications

Analysis of the Potential for a Hillside Collapse for a Community in Changhua County, Taiwan

Analysis of the Potential for a Hillside Collapse for a Community in Changhua County, Taiwan

A Multi-criteria Decision-making Framework for Selecting the Best Low Impact Development Techniques (LIDs)

A Topsis and Electre Comparison Analysis on Web-Based Software

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About