1994
DOI: 10.1142/9789812797858_0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodologies for Evaluating Thinning Algorithms for Character Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of the grapheme was governed by the previous work on feature extraction [7]. Similarly to the experiments of Plamondon et al [12], human subjects were involved in skeleton comparison. Instead of drawing the entire skeletons, 5 people were asked to mark several skeleton points important for feature extraction: top points of stems of "t" and "h", t-bar crossing point, and t-bar left and right ends and bottom point of "t" stem (when possible) of total 150 samples of "th" taken from 30 different writers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of the grapheme was governed by the previous work on feature extraction [7]. Similarly to the experiments of Plamondon et al [12], human subjects were involved in skeleton comparison. Instead of drawing the entire skeletons, 5 people were asked to mark several skeleton points important for feature extraction: top points of stems of "t" and "h", t-bar crossing point, and t-bar left and right ends and bottom point of "t" stem (when possible) of total 150 samples of "th" taken from 30 different writers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 1(b) and 1(c) show that changing the threshold value in an attempt to save the loop results in distortion of other parts of the image. When a person looks at a grayscale image of a handwritten character they can easily restore the original pen tip trajectory with high precision [12]. This is not always the case for a binary image ( Figure 1(d), 1(e)).…”
Section: Binary Vs Grayscale Imagementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Besides this, six other distance measures proposed in [21] and [22] were tested to check whether they can be used for measuring the goodness of match. The first two are nearest neighbor distances.…”
Section: B Pattern Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been done mostly by using temporal (dynamic) information recovery techniques such as contour analysis [24], [25], gray-scale examination [26], [27], and path minimization [28], [29], [30]. Other methods include thinning/skeletonization [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39] and morphological loop investigation [40], [41], [42]. This paper improves aspects of former solutions; we detect and resolve the structure of most loops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%