1980
DOI: 10.21236/ada125892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodologies for Correcting Deficiencies in Training Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, incorrect ariswefs or responses are best handled by helping trainees arrive at a correct answer on their own with guidance applied early in the training session if the correct answers or movements are not forthcoming. Giving trainees the correct answer or physically helping them to make a required movement throughout training is not recommended (Spears, Maxey, & Roush, 1980).…”
Section: Guidance Vs Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, incorrect ariswefs or responses are best handled by helping trainees arrive at a correct answer on their own with guidance applied early in the training session if the correct answers or movements are not forthcoming. Giving trainees the correct answer or physically helping them to make a required movement throughout training is not recommended (Spears, Maxey, & Roush, 1980).…”
Section: Guidance Vs Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant issues, decision points, and coverage followed directly from the methodology itself and indirectly from the materials used to design it (Branson, Raynor, Cox, Furman, King, and Hannum, 1975;Ellis and Wulfeck, 1978;Ellis, Wulfeck, and Fredericks, 1979;Harless Performance Guild, 1979). Two sources (Spears, Maxey, and Roush, 1980;Kristiansen, 1981) did, however, serve as guidance for the content and structure of the revision methodology.…”
Section: Baseline For the Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%