2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
427
0
16

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 604 publications
(467 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
18
427
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Such analysis should allow the development of more sophisticated future research. INVs using the 6-years-to-entry criterion of Coviello and Jones (2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such analysis should allow the development of more sophisticated future research. INVs using the 6-years-to-entry criterion of Coviello and Jones (2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Descriptive variables included size of firm based on number of employees and revenue, age of the firm, status of the firm (public, private), and sector of application of biotechnologies (health, agriculture, nutrition, environment). Years-to-first-entry into at least one foreign market was used to validate respondent firms as INVs, consistent with the 6-years-to-entry criterion (Coviello and Jones 2004). In addition, international diversity and order of foreign market entry were included as descriptive variables to provide a richer profile of study participants' international activities.…”
Section: Data Collection and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Between the months of June and August 2015, we contacted 12 different entrepreneurs in the manufacturing sector to conduct in-depth interviews. Since our aim was to explore the period of developing stakeholder relationships, and to avoid generalizing the findings, a small number of cases could be used to derive rich and meaningful information [Coviello, Jones, 2004]. According to Patton [Patton, 2002, p. 245]: "The validity, meaningfulness, insights generated from a qualitative inquiry have to do more with the information richness or the cases selected and the observational (analytical) capabilities of the researcher than with the sample size".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a small firm can rank higher in a relative increase of any measure compared to a larger counterpart with the same absolute increase. Coviello and Jones (2004) point out in their review that employee number and annual sales are the two most frequently used size measures for firms. Total assets have also been employed by researchers to measure firm size.…”
Section: Firm Growth Size Profitability and Their Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%