2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12611-017-0432-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Méthodes peropératoires pour améliorer l’estimation des pertes sanguines chirurgicales et par voie vaginale en cours de césarienne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monitoring of study participants and data collection: The data collected before the surgical intervention included sociodemographic parameters, information on the surgical pathology to be operated on, Altemeier and ASA classes, the chosen anesthesia technique; during the intervention the SAS (Table 1) parameters, and at the end of the intervention the duration of the intervention was noted, the SAS calculated and scored as described above [7] [8]. The HR and the MAP were taken from the values automatically displayed on the multiparameter monitor (Mindray MEC-1000), the blood losses quantified from the blood contained in the suction jar and that deduced from the weighing of the gauzes and the surgical linen freshly soaked in blood using a precision balance type S F 400 Light Cameroon; the difference between the weight of the wet laundry and its weight in the dry state being the weight of the blood of which 1g corresponds to 1cc [15]. In the early postoperative period, serious complications and deaths were recorded through regular monitoring of patients during hospitalization and then after returning home by telephone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring of study participants and data collection: The data collected before the surgical intervention included sociodemographic parameters, information on the surgical pathology to be operated on, Altemeier and ASA classes, the chosen anesthesia technique; during the intervention the SAS (Table 1) parameters, and at the end of the intervention the duration of the intervention was noted, the SAS calculated and scored as described above [7] [8]. The HR and the MAP were taken from the values automatically displayed on the multiparameter monitor (Mindray MEC-1000), the blood losses quantified from the blood contained in the suction jar and that deduced from the weighing of the gauzes and the surgical linen freshly soaked in blood using a precision balance type S F 400 Light Cameroon; the difference between the weight of the wet laundry and its weight in the dry state being the weight of the blood of which 1g corresponds to 1cc [15]. In the early postoperative period, serious complications and deaths were recorded through regular monitoring of patients during hospitalization and then after returning home by telephone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite imprecise measurement routines, establishing alert thresholds and responsive management is crucial. 52,53 Secondary PPH, occurring after the initial 24 h post-partum, is infrequently assessed in women with BDs, despite frequent reports of heightened and prolonged bleeding issues. Improving post-delivery follow-up in the weeks after delivery necessitates more standardized practices, especially considering complications like hemoperitoneum or uterine meshing.…”
Section: Post-partum Haemorrhagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in carriers of haemophilia, reported PPH rates can range from 0 to 63% across different cohorts. Despite imprecise measurement routines, establishing alert thresholds and responsive management is crucial 52,53 …”
Section: How To Incorporate Women‐specific Outcomes For Women and Gir...mentioning
confidence: 99%