IntroductionOur purpose in conducting this study was to determine whether administration of high-dose tranexamic acid (TA) at the time of diagnosis of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) could reduce blood loss.MethodsThis was a randomised, controlled, multicentred, open-label trial. Women with PPH >800 mL following vaginal delivery were randomly assigned to receive TA (loading dose 4 g over 1 hour, then infusion of 1 g/hour over 6 hours) or not. In both groups, packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and colloids could be used according to French guidelines. The use of additional procoagulant treatments was permitted only in cases involving intractable bleeding. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of TA in the reduction of blood loss in women with PPH, and the secondary objectives were the effect of TA on PPH duration, anaemia, transfusion and the need for invasive procedures.ResultsA total of 144 women fully completed the protocol (72 in each group). Blood loss between enrolment and 6 hours later was significantly lower in the TA group than in the control group (median, 173 mL; first to third quartiles, 59 to 377) than in controls (221 mL; first to third quartiles 105 to 564) (P = 0.041). In the TA group, bleeding duration was shorter and progression to severe PPH and PRBC transfusion was less frequent than in controls (P < 0.03). Invasive procedures were performed in four women in the TA group and in seven controls (P = NS). PPH stopped after only uterotonics and PRBC transfusion in 93% of women in the TA group versus 79% of controls (P = 0.016). Mild, transient adverse manifestations occurred more often in the TA group than in the control group (P = 0.03).ConclusionsThis study is the first to demonstrate that high-dose TA can reduce blood loss and maternal morbidity in women with PPH. Although the study was not adequately powered to address safety issues, the observed side effects were mild and transient. A larger international study is needed to investigate whether TA can decrease the need for invasive procedures and reduce maternal morbidity in women with PPH.Trial registrationControlled Trials ISRCTN09968140.

Core outcome sets for PPH: nine core outcomes for PPH prevention and 12 core outcomes for PPH treatment.

No abstract

NCT00694343 (http://clinicaltrials.gov).

No abstract

Summary. Background: Case reports on recombinant human factor VIIa (rhuFVIIa) use in women with severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) showed encouraging results, but no randomized controlled trial (RCT) is available. Patients and methods: Eighty-four women with severe PPH unresponsive to uterotonics were randomized to receive one early single rhuFVIIa infusion (n = 42) or standard care (no rhuFVIIa; n = 42). The primary efficacy outcome measure was the reduction of the need for specific second-line therapies, such as interventional hemostatic procedures, for blood loss and transfusions. The primary safety outcome measure was the number of deaths and thrombotic events during the 5 days following rhuFVIIa infusion. Results: rhuFVIIa was associated with a reduction in the number of patients who needed second-line therapies compared with controls (standard care). Specifically, 39/42 (93%) patients in the standard care arm received second-line therapies and 22/42 (52%) patients in the rhuFVIIa arm (absolute difference, 41%; range, 18-63%; relative risk RR, 0.56 [0.42-0.76]). The delivery mode (vaginal or Cesarean section) did not affect the primary outcome. No death occurred. Two venous thrombotic events were recorded in the rhuFVIIa arm: one ovarian vein thrombosis and one deep vein thrombosis with a non-severe pulmonary embolism. Conclusion: This open RCT in women with severe PPH refractory to uterotonics shows that rhuFVIIa reduces the need for specific second-line therapies in about one in three patients, with the occurrence of non-fatal venous thrombotic events in one in 20 patients.

No abstract

IMA and IMA normalized to albumin appear to be significantly increased during pathological pregnancies. These results confirm that IMA could be used as a biological marker of preeclampsia. These data need to be confirmed by determining intra-individual IMA change during normal and pathological pregnancy.