2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.07.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method validation using weighted linear regression models for quantification of UV filters in water samples

Abstract: This paper describes the validation of a method consisting of solid-phase extraction followed by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of the ultraviolet (UV) filters benzophenone-3, ethylhexyl salicylate, ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate and octocrylene. The method validation criteria included evaluation of selectivity, analytical curve, trueness, precision, limits of detection and limits of quantification. The non-weighted linear regression model has traditionally been used for calibration,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The residues were plotted against the concentrations of the analytical curves. 29,30 R = S exp − S int (2) With a well-adjusted model, one can do the analysis of variance to test the statistical significance of the linear regression equation. A good way to evaluate this is by comparing the mean of the quadratic sum variance explained in the model ( ) by the average quadratic sum of the residue ( ).…”
Section: Linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residues were plotted against the concentrations of the analytical curves. 29,30 R = S exp − S int (2) With a well-adjusted model, one can do the analysis of variance to test the statistical significance of the linear regression equation. A good way to evaluate this is by comparing the mean of the quadratic sum variance explained in the model ( ) by the average quadratic sum of the residue ( ).…”
Section: Linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high sample volumes in this procedure, usually from 100 mL (Goksoyr et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2010) up to 1.0 L (Kameda et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2011) is the main disadvantage of this technique. Because UV-filters are relatively polar, the great majority of authors use intermediate polarity solvents like dichloromethane (DCM) (Goksoyr et al, 2009;Kameda et al, 2011;Lambropoulou et al, 2002;Tashiro and Kameda, 2013) or ethyl acetate (EA) (Arukwe et al, 2012;Balmer et al, 2005;da Silva et al, 2015;Negreira et al, 2008;Poiger et al, 2004) to extract water samples. However, Rodil et al (2012) used a more polar solvent, methanol (MeOH), which is justified by the complex mixture analysed, containing not only very polar UV-filters (like PBSA and BP4), but also other polar compounds like pharmaceuticals and herbicides.…”
Section: Extraction Techniques For Water Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipid species with levels below their respective LOD were considered absent and those with levels below LOQ were not quantified and hence not used for calculation of total amounts of lipid within the assessed lipid classes. A weighted calibration curve (1/Y) was used for TG and FAs, due to significant heteroscedasticity of the data 38 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%