2015
DOI: 10.1364/boe.6.003678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method to quantify accuracy of position feedback signals of a three-dimensional two-photon laser-scanning microscope

Abstract: Two-photon laser-scanning microscopy enables to record neuronal network activity in three-dimensional space while maintaining single-cellular resolution. One of the proposed approaches combines galvanometric x-y scanning with piezo-driven objective movements and employs hardware feedback signals for position monitoring. However, readily applicable methods to quantify the accuracy of those feedback signals are currently lacking. Here we provide techniques based on contactfree laser reflection and laser triangul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imaging was performed using a Movable Objective Microscope (Sutter Instrument) equipped with two galvanometric scan mirrors (6210 H, MicroMax 673 XX Dual Axis Servo Driver, Cambridge Technology) and a piezo focusing unit (P-725.4CD PIFOC, E-665.CR amplifier, Physik Instrumente) controlled by a custom-made software written in LabVIEW 2010 (National Instruments; Kummer et al, 2015 ) and MPScope ( Nguyen et al, 2006 ). Fluorescence excitation at 920 nm was provided by a tunable Ti:Sapphire laser (Chameleon Ultra II, Coherent) using a 20×/1.0 NA water immersion objective (XLUMPLFLN 20XW, Olympus).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging was performed using a Movable Objective Microscope (Sutter Instrument) equipped with two galvanometric scan mirrors (6210 H, MicroMax 673 XX Dual Axis Servo Driver, Cambridge Technology) and a piezo focusing unit (P-725.4CD PIFOC, E-665.CR amplifier, Physik Instrumente) controlled by a custom-made software written in LabVIEW 2010 (National Instruments; Kummer et al, 2015 ) and MPScope ( Nguyen et al, 2006 ). Fluorescence excitation at 920 nm was provided by a tunable Ti:Sapphire laser (Chameleon Ultra II, Coherent) using a 20×/1.0 NA water immersion objective (XLUMPLFLN 20XW, Olympus).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging was performed using a Movable Objective Microscope (Sutter Instrument) equipped with two galvanometric scan mirrors (6210H, MicroMax 673XX Dual Axis Servo Driver, Cambridge Technology) and a piezo focusing unit (P-725.4CD PIFOC, E-665.CR amplifier, Physik Instrumente) controlled by a custom-made software written in LabVIEW 2010 (National Instruments) (Kummer et al, 2015) and MPScope (Nguyen et al, 2006). Fluorescence excitation at 920 nm was provided by a tunable Ti:Sapphire laser (Chameleon Ultra II, Coherent) using a 20×/1.0 NA water immersion objective (XLUMPLFLN 20XW, Olympus).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual movement of the galvanometric mirrors may lag behind the signal that controls them (command signal; Kummer et al, 2015). In many galvanometric mirror types, including the ones used in this study, the actual mirror movement can be monitored through the signal of the feedback output (feedback signal).…”
Section: Stability Of Trajectory Computation and Precision Of Slsmentioning
confidence: 99%