1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0341-8162(99)00028-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method to predict cropland ephemeral gully erosion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
94
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
94
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Woodward (1999) developed a physically based Ephemeral Gully Erosion Model (EGEM) in which locations of EGs and EG length were to be provided by the user. Gordon et al (2007) addressed limitations of EGEM by revising equations for flow that resulted in a Revised EGEM (REGEM) model and incorporated it as a module within the Annualized Agricultural Non-Point Source Model to add EG erosion prediction to standard sheet and rill erosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woodward (1999) developed a physically based Ephemeral Gully Erosion Model (EGEM) in which locations of EGs and EG length were to be provided by the user. Gordon et al (2007) addressed limitations of EGEM by revising equations for flow that resulted in a Revised EGEM (REGEM) model and incorporated it as a module within the Annualized Agricultural Non-Point Source Model to add EG erosion prediction to standard sheet and rill erosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of EG erosion is well established (Foster, 1986;Thorne et al, 1986;Poesen et al, 1996;Nachtergaele and Poesen, 1999;Poesen et al, 2003), but only a few process-based hydrologic or erosion models have included EG subroutines: Ephemeral Gully Erosion Model (EGEM; Woodward, 1999); Revised Ephemeral Gully Erosion Model (REGEM; Gordon et al, 2007); Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems (CREAMS; Knisel, 1980); Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems (GLEAMS; Knisel, 1993); Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP; Flanagan and Nearing, 1995); and Annualized Agricultural Nonpoint Source Model (AnnAGNPS; Bingner and Theurer, 2003). These models, however, do not predict the location of EGs, which must be input into the models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More refined models try to include the influence of the sediments detached from the soil (see for example (Woodward, 1999;Bonelli et al, 2006;Brivois et al, 2007)), or consider probabilistic models for the erosion factors (Sidorchuk, 2005), however it remains unclear whether the alternatives they provide are truly required with respect to the simpler model of equation [7]. Following (Wan et al, 2004a;Knapen et al, 2007), an approximation can be used to derive the hydraulic shear stress as a function of the gradient of the hydraulic head,…”
Section: Modeling Of Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%