2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating ephemeral gullies with a process-based topographic index model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(48 reference statements)
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decades, the importance of gully erosion has been widely recognized (Capra et al, 2009;Cheng et al, 2007;Daggupati et al, 2014;Nachtergaele et al, 2001;Stefano et al, 2013;Woodward, 1999). Poesen et al (2003) distinguished ephemeral gullies from rills by a critical cross-sectional area of 929 cm 2 (1 ft 2 ), while others defined it with a critical width, such as 0.3 m (Brice, 1966) or 0.5 m (Imeson and Kwaad, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, the importance of gully erosion has been widely recognized (Capra et al, 2009;Cheng et al, 2007;Daggupati et al, 2014;Nachtergaele et al, 2001;Stefano et al, 2013;Woodward, 1999). Poesen et al (2003) distinguished ephemeral gullies from rills by a critical cross-sectional area of 929 cm 2 (1 ft 2 ), while others defined it with a critical width, such as 0.3 m (Brice, 1966) or 0.5 m (Imeson and Kwaad, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daggupati et al . (), using several topographic index‐ and process‐based models, obtained optimal κ values ranging from 0.17 to 0.3 and R 2 correlations from 0.39 to 0.5. A more recent study by Sheshukov et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to use the proposed gully model in regional watershed models, one of three methods is often employed to assess the magnitude of soil loss due to gully erosion within the watershed: (1) identification of all existing gullies in the watershed using air photographs and field work; (2) identification of potential gully initiation points and their density by a priori modeling of threshold conditions from detailed modeling of parameters such as slope, drainage area, runoff and rock fragments (Torri and Poesen, ); or the OFT‐SWAT model after Daggupati et al . () and/or; (3) based on statistical analysis of gully density and general gully dimensions from a statistical sampling of homogeneous soil–landscape regions as used in the Sednet Model (Prosser et al, ) or similar work by Zhao et al . () in the Chinese Loess Plateau.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%